On 6/28/2014 1:17 AM, Linda Lee wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 11:01:35 PM UTC-4, SwordOz wrote:
>> "Linda Lee" wrote in message
>> news:0828da78-42f1-4577-b364-64fb5abbb070@googlegroups.com...
>> On Saturday, June 21, 2014 10:47:41 PM UTC-4, SwordOz wrote:
>>> "Sword" wrote in message news:...
>>> "Linda Lee" wrote in message
>>> news:cb924048-abab-4db4-9ea5-e59b12b72da4@googlegroups.com...
>>> On Friday, June 13, 2014 8:26:39 PM UTC-4, SwordOz wrote:
>>>> "Linda Lee" wrote in message
>>>> news:1195975b-5bcd-476f-92d8-4e5abb8fb367@googlegroups.com...
>>>> It's odd how Nancy/Pegleg believes someone like Richard
>>>> (aka Anathema aka Up from the Abyss/Abyss) who along
>>>> with SwordOz (another of her buddies) last year said they'd
>>>> killed a cat because they actually wanted to kill me, to be so
>>>> wonderful and believes me to be bad because I believe people
>>>> like that are evil.
>>>> ***
>>>> For all the biblical astuteness you present Linda may I
>>>> suggest
>>>> you open your bible to the OT and sincerely contemplate Ex
>>>> 20:16
>>>> which states ... "Thou shalt not bear false witness against
>>>> thy
>>>> neighbor."
<snip for brevity>
>>>> ***
>>> It wasn't a false witness, and you know it; you're the only one
>>> lying about this. Now get lost, jerk.
>>> ***
<snip>
>>>Would
>>> you
>>> please produce the e-mail message which supposedly stated that
>>> "they'd
>>> killed a cat because they actually wanted to kill me [Linda]."
>>> ***
>> Your vileness is here in this thread
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/alt.messianic/cat$20linda$20lee/alt.messianic/Wmy1BH0Hzaw/UWLA6Lp208UJ
I'm real tired of you FREAKS, and by freaks, I don't mean hippies.
>> ***
>> and ... where in the thread can be found the "rich and sword
>> actually wanted to kill Linda" statement? Since in mind Linda
>> she believes her reading comprehension surpasses sword's ... can
>> she please point our where that purported statement resides
>> in that e-mail???
>>> How you've
>>> ever come to this incredulous reasoning concerning what was
>>> stated goes
>>> beyond the sensibilities of common sense and reading
>>> comprehension.
>>> ***
>> I see you're quoting Ed Form.
>> ***
>> In all honesty Linda I didn't know that.
>> ***
> In all honesty, you're a liar.
***
So be it ... as Linda's perversion of honesty is quite obvious.
***
>> ***
>> Linda, please put this unsubstantiated non-evidentiary cat sniping
>> to
>> bed once and for all concerning this accusation.
>> ***
> I looked at the thread and Abyss/Richard/Anathema's single post where
> he had said you two had killed the cat because you wanted to kill me
> was MAGICALLY deleted from the discussion, indicated by a "This
> message has been deleted" notation.
***
HUmmmmm ... MAGICALLY deleted ... HUH?
What's *odd* about Linda's MAGICALLY story is that she was asked
likewise in the past to produce the e-mail stating that ... "they'd
killed a cat because they actually wanted to kill me [Linda]" and
couldn't produce it then either.
Now Linda's story gravitates into a single post theory which she claims
thus far as being MAGICALLY deleted from the discussion by someone.
What is unusually *odd* Linda is for someone to be overly obsessed
concerning others supposedly wanting to "kill you" that you didn't
*ARCHIVE* a copy of that post to substantiate it's content.
By the way this is the first time I recall reading an accusation about a
"single post" theory having emanated from Rich. As the obsession
increases the more *odder* the scenario gets.
***
> "non-evidentiary" that he ever said that. Lol! 'You have no
> evidence; you can't prove it!' is the usual cry of the guilty man.
***
The only evidence you have Linda is that which you've dreamt up in your
mind through curiosity.
If you believe Sword's a guilty man so be it. But in the meantime
I've known Rich through discussions for nigh over 15 years and can
attest that I've never seen him state in a posting agreement with
someone else prior to the other individual posting in accord likewise
which begs the question ... "Can Linda produce an e-mail reply from
Sword verifying that Sword agreed with Rich according to Linda's
accusations of "wanting to kill her"?
***
> have no need to prove anything to anyone;
***
Agree ... and that's simply because obsessive here-say can not prove
anything to anyone.
***
you know what was said and
> what you did, but I can see why you wouldn't want evidence like that
> laying around.
***
And Sword knows that the "here-say" that's been laid around, which was
NOT stated by Sword whatsoever, is being used for it's persecution value.
>Too bad for you two oddballs that you can't delete
> your evil deeds like you delete your posts; God is not fooled by
> frauds such as the two of you.
***
If "here-say" had been deleted from the beginning this discussion
wouldn't be taking place. I don't fear your gentile God ... but likewise
beware of rhetorical "here-say" because it's easily discerned by the
Hebrew GOD YHVH.
Sword
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
|
|