<Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH> wrote in message
news:6mctsvg37igusun42ln0h3igfgem6gh3l7@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:51:17 GMT, "Thomas Trust"
> <Trust@Americanpride.com> wrote:
>
> >
> ><Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH> wrote in message
> >news:53bssvcfet6g7nlaurvlp1e5ksj644fkno@4ax.com...
>
> >>
> >> Then the trip should have been cancelled. This was not news, just a
> >> photo-op and the press has no obligation to censor itself to help bush
> >> win votes. Next question.
> >
> >
> >No, the Commander in Chief can visit troops if he damn well pleases. The
> >actual visit isn't what bothers you, it's that he's doing the right thing
> >and looking good doing it is what's bothering you, it pisses you off.
> >
>
> If bush cared only about the troops he'd have just left the press
> behind and gone to iraq without them. But no - he wanted the
> photo-op.
You can't have it both ways, had he done that he would have been accused of
trying to hide something and secrecy, which has already been brought up
without merit......
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
|