altPrev. Next
Re: Media censored Bush photo-op in Iraq MediaCom High Speed Inte ..
Thomas Trust (Trust@Americanpride.com) 2003/12/03 16:07

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Thomas Trust" <Trust@Americanpride.com>
Newsgroups: alt
References: <u39ssv4nloejnvispal2lubltj7jurr70n@4ax.com> <eIpzb.408556$Tr4.1171321@attbi_s03> <53bssvcfet6g7nlaurvlp1e5ksj644fkno@4ax.com> <Fgqzb.405656$HS4.3265793@attbi_s01> <vssp0e56479561@corp.supernews.com>
Subject: Re: Media censored Bush photo-op in Iraq
Lines: 40
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <81uzb.406875$HS4.3276739@attbi_s01>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.215.146.42
X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com
X-Trace: attbi_s01 1070492868 12.215.146.42 (Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:07:48 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:07:48 GMT
Organization: MediaCom High Speed Internet
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:07:48 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt:56


"Jeffrey Turner" <jturner@localnet.com> wrote in message
news:vssp0e56479561@corp.supernews.com...
> Thomas Trust wrote:
> > <Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH> wrote:
> >>On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:12:26 GMT, "Thomas Trust"
> >><Trust@Americanpride.com> wrote:
> >>><Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>13 journalists were invited to accompany bush on his Thansgiving day
> >>>>trip to the troops in Iraq.  But they were told they couldn't tell
> >>>>their family or even their editor about it!!.  Why did the press go
> >>>>along with that restriction?  This was nothing but a photo-op for bush
> >>>>and the press had no obligation to keep the story secret until the WH
> >>>>gave them the OK to tell the world.  Goddam bush toadies in the media
> >>>>are flat-out working for the GOP.
> >>>
> >>>Dream on.  The security reasons behind such precautions is obvious.
> >>
> >>Then the trip should have been cancelled.  This was not news, just a
> >>photo-op and the press has no obligation to censor itself to help bush
> >>win votes. Next question.
> >
> > No, the Commander in Chief can visit troops if he damn well pleases.
The
> > actual visit isn't what bothers you, it's that he's doing the right
thing
> > and looking good doing it is what's bothering you, it pisses you off.
>
> It's empty symbolism.  Now the president can go back to cutting
> veterans' benefits and other programs that benefit regular Americans.
> Did you get all choked up about the pardoning of the (other) White
> House turkey, too?
>


Cite your cut claims.  And for the record, I think the turkey tradition is
ridiculous.



Follow-ups:12345678910111213141516171819
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite