| Re: Media censored Bush photo-op in Iraq |
Posted via Supernews, ht .. |
| () |
2003/12/03 11:34 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH <>
Newsgroups: alt
Subject: Re: Media censored Bush photo-op in Iraq
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 11:34:25 -0700
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <53bssvcfet6g7nlaurvlp1e5ksj644fkno@4ax.com>
References: <u39ssv4nloejnvispal2lubltj7jurr70n@4ax.com> <eIpzb.408556$Tr4.1171321@attbi_s03>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 23
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt:51
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:12:26 GMT, "Thomas Trust"
<Trust@Americanpride.com> wrote:
>
><Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH> wrote in message
>news:u39ssv4nloejnvispal2lubltj7jurr70n@4ax.com...
>> 13 journalists were invited to accompany bush on his Thansgiving day
>> trip to the troops in Iraq. But they were told they couldn't tell
>> their family or even their editor about it!!. Why did the press go
>> along with that restriction? This was nothing but a photo-op for bush
>> and the press had no obligation to keep the story secret until the WH
>> gave them the OK to tell the world. Goddam bush toadies in the media
>> are flat-out working for the GOP.
>>
>
>
>Dream on. The security reasons behind such precautions is obvious.
>
Then the trip should have been cancelled. This was not news, just a
photo-op and the press has no obligation to censor itself to help bush
win votes. Next question.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
|
|