On 6 Apr 2004 22:19:22 GMT, RobertVB <nospam@4me.com> wrote:
>In article <097c3d528c99e05ab70d1febd1500011@news.teranews.com>,
>Sandeman <sandeman@nomail.com> wrote:
>
>> Islander wrote:
>>
>> > Sandeman wrote:
>> >
>> >> Islander wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> OK, then by your logic, heterosexual couples who choose not to have
>> >>> children should be denied the legal advantages of marriage?
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> A heterosexual couple can change their mind and have children or
>> >> mother nature might intervene.
>> >>
>> >> The gays and lesbians will never have children.
>> >
>> >
>> > Actually, you are mistaken. There are several ways that homosexual
>> > couples can have children
>>
>>
>> Do let us know when one of them queers gives birth.
>
>lesbians have them all the time - I know a couple that has 2 children
>of their own.
They don't have kids at all. One of them may go walk on the normal
side of sex or get an assist from science but two women can't produce
a baby. It takes an essential contribution from one woman and one
man. Perversity is all the other solutions.
>And, of course, they often have children from previous heterosexual
>marriages, and they can adopt - a couple I know have adopted 3 kids so
>far.
Poor kids.
|
|