Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: gcarras@aol.com (Steve Carras)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.brady-bunch
Subject: Re: Brady Bunch Television Show
Date: 6 Apr 2004 13:58:27 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <8c311548.0404061258.73a79f6a@posting.google.com>
References: <20040405213530.17086.00000841@mb-m28.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.214.156.216
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1081285107 14853 127.0.0.1 (6 Apr 2004 20:58:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 20:58:27 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.tv.brady-bunch:782
saggiediaperz@aol.com (Saggiediaperz) wrote in message news:<20040405213530.17086.00000841@mb-m28.aol.com>...
> I was wondering if Mike ever considered putting the kids on a bowel movement
> schedule? Each child would have only one BM per day, and that BM would be
> scheduled and weighed. For example, Jan would move her bowels from 7:30am to
> 7:35am every morning. The kids would be severely disciplined with corporal
> punishment spankings if they did not follow the bowel movement schedule, or
> made a larger or smaller BM than they were allotted. The schedule could be
> adjusted as the kids grew older. For example, as Cindy and Bobby moved into
> puberty, the time allotted to make their BM could be increased, and the
> allotment for a larger bowel movement would be made.
>
> Mike would have saved on sewer costs and toilet paper, and the kids would
> become well disciplined and able to handle a scheduled, structured lifestyle.
> Mike, however, probably would not want to do the spankings pants down, just in
> case one of the kids had an accident. He would have ended up getting his hands
> dirty with BM if he did.
>
> What do you think?
you're sick.
SC, Julia Stiles fan
|
|