| Re: Brady Bunch Television Show |
EasyNews, UseNet made Ea .. |
| Brady (llendiditdke@hotmail.com) |
2004/04/05 22:48 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Brady" <llendiditdke@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.brady-bunch
References: <20040405213530.17086.00000841@mb-m28.aol.com>
Subject: Re: Brady Bunch Television Show
Lines: 35
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <qEqcc.12432382$Id.2076679@news.easynews.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 04:48:22 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.tv.brady-bunch:778
The way Jan waddled in many of the episodes, I doubt if she ever made it to
the toilet.
"Saggiediaperz" <saggiediaperz@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040405213530.17086.00000841@mb-m28.aol.com...
> I was wondering if Mike ever considered putting the kids on a bowel
movement
> schedule? Each child would have only one BM per day, and that BM would be
> scheduled and weighed. For example, Jan would move her bowels from 7:30am
to
> 7:35am every morning. The kids would be severely disciplined with
corporal
> punishment spankings if they did not follow the bowel movement schedule,
or
> made a larger or smaller BM than they were allotted. The schedule could
be
> adjusted as the kids grew older. For example, as Cindy and Bobby moved
into
> puberty, the time allotted to make their BM could be increased, and the
> allotment for a larger bowel movement would be made.
>
> Mike would have saved on sewer costs and toilet paper, and the kids would
> become well disciplined and able to handle a scheduled, structured
lifestyle.
> Mike, however, probably would not want to do the spankings pants down,
just in
> case one of the kids had an accident. He would have ended up getting his
hands
> dirty with BM if he did.
>
> What do you think?
>
|
|
|