Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: frank <frank_member@newsguy.com>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.brady-bunch
Subject: Re: Who'd rather talk about Carols ass than the brady bowels?
Date: 27 Sep 2003 13:54:58 -0700
Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://newsguy.com]
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <bl4tf202fhb@drn.newsguy.com>
References: <bj0qhu01o0v@drn.newsguy.com> <vl7vcbknfftg9b@corp.supernews.com> <bj21ts02k8r@drn.newsguy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-623.newsdawg.com
X-No-Archive: Yes
X-Newsreader: Direct Read News 4.20
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.tv.brady-bunch:309
In article <bj21ts02k8r@drn.newsguy.com>, frank says...
>
>In article <vl7vcbknfftg9b@corp.supernews.com>, Brady says...
>>
>>Wherein, exactly is the difference. She had a decent pooter duing the first
>>season, but the camera was always in the wrong place. By the Hawaii episode,
>>her bottom had grown to insane proportions. After that, we never got a good
>>look at it. After '72, the three daughters had much more desirable tushies.
>>"Dr right" <Dr_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
>>news:bj0qhu01o0v@drn.newsguy.com...
>>> Well,who would?
>>>
>>Did ya see her ass profile in the pool table episode? Not bad looking
>>considering she was wearing a dress and not those pantsuits.
>>Frank wrote in message56895769.net>>We never did she her rear end. It was
>>covered by pantsuits. The HI episode was the only time we saw her cheeks. Her
>>cheeks were not that huge(unless I missed a scene that was cut out)but check out
>>her bare midriff. Not bad for an old broad.
>Carol did not wear a bathing suit after that.I guess it was too sexy for the BB?
>Not even shorts too check out her legs.
>
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|