Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: frank <frank_member@newsguy.com>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.brady-bunch
Subject: Re: Who'd rather talk about Carols ass than the brady bowels?
Date: 2 Sep 2003 05:20:12 -0700
Organization: Newsguy News Service [http://newsguy.com]
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <bj21ts02k8r@drn.newsguy.com>
References: <bj0qhu01o0v@drn.newsguy.com> <vl7vcbknfftg9b@corp.supernews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-917.newsdawg.com
X-No-Archive: Yes
X-Newsreader: Direct Read News 4.20
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.tv.brady-bunch:215
In article <vl7vcbknfftg9b@corp.supernews.com>, Brady says...
>
>Wherein, exactly is the difference. She had a decent pooter duing the first
>season, but the camera was always in the wrong place. By the Hawaii episode,
>her bottom had grown to insane proportions. After that, we never got a good
>look at it. After '72, the three daughters had much more desirable tushies.
>"Dr right" <Dr_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
>news:bj0qhu01o0v@drn.newsguy.com...
>> Well,who would?
>>
>
>Frank wrote in message56895769.net>>We never did she her rear end. It was
>covered by pantsuits. The HI episode was the only time we saw her cheeks. Her
>cheeks were not that huge(unless I missed a scene that was cut out)but check out
>her bare midriff. Not bad for an old broad.
Carol did not wear a bathing suit after that.I guess it was too sexy for the BB?
Not even shorts too check out her legs.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|