Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3FEA0B53.5F69517D@blueyonder.co.uk>
From: Paul Heslop <paul.heslop@blueyonder.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.surrealism
Subject: Re: Phallic Plate Heads for Oxford
References: <3F7610D7.BEA8372A@cloud9.net> <3F7FDE51.DF64A658@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F86379A.ADD8E05C@cloud9.net> <3F868E5D.E9924BE4@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F87939F.B1C78A69@cloud9.net> <3F88147D.C53B8AE3@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F90AEFE.BE959C84@cloud9.net> <3F91C33A.3047452A@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F93E773.6F7D5DC7@cloud9.net> <3F948B34.A11B95B3@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F9CA4B7.1279E71B@cloud9.net> <3F9CF62A.EC5FBDD4@blueyonder.co.uk> <3FA1F7E0.E6C5BAD1@cloud9.net> <3FA2538A.2F00E543@blueyonder.co.uk> <3FB3401A.35BDD58D@cloud9.net> <3FB44320.D8ED2582@blueyonder.co.uk> <3FC01155.83411E59@cloudNINE.net> <3FC41FD6.4A37B2F8@blueyonder.co.uk> <3FC6C911.66EC220D@cloudNINE.net> <3FC71796.31601480@blueyonder.co.uk> <3FC96F99.DDA99C30@cloudNINE.net> <3FC9D42E.317B3F8B@blueyonder.co.uk> <3FD13DC5.60DC77C6@cloudNINE.net> <3FD15B3F.1573CC6@blueyonder.co.uk> <3FE4EC61.1F480788@cloudNINE.net> <3FE7C8C3.16E4@perfectBLOKmail.com> <3FE85DB8.89885525@blueyonder.co.uk> <3FE9F6DD.E365C66C@cloud8.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 48
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 21:55:32 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.39.106.142
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blueyonder.co.uk
X-Trace: news-text.cableinet.net 1072302932 82.39.106.142 (Wed, 24 Dec 2003 21:55:32 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 21:55:32 GMT
Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.surrealism:970
elag wrote:
> Paul Heslop wrote:
> >
> > Parry wrote:
> >
> > > elag wrote:
> > > > I'm not beyond feeling some apprehension based on people's appearance,
> > > > at times. After all, it is in part a defense mechanism,
> > >
> > > I also have an initial prejudice caused by certain ways of dress --
> > > particularly business suits, cop-military uniforms, and white collars or
> > > other religious regalia. Skin colour not so much, except for chemical
> > > tans.
> > >
> > > -- Parry
> >
> > yes, we're all probably guilty of that. We judge a lot by what people are
> > wearing... specially if that person wears denim, boots, has a shaved head
> > and a swastika tatoo.
>
> Hmmm... I love (black) denim and I always wear combat boots... I've had
> a (partly) shaved head. I wouldn't wear a swastika and I don't like
> what it stood for, but I've always kind of liked it as a design... and
> the fact that it shows up in nearly every culture on earth (I've seen
> them in Pompeii) and is still considered a sacred symbol among (for
> example) Hindus.
>
> I even made a veailed ref to these factoids in my thesis film, though I
> replaced swastikas w/ spirals. which are nearly as common.
>
> It's a shame a perfectly good symbol/design was ruined.
>
> --
> Replace "8" with "9" to reply.
Agreed. I was a skinhead, at least in appearance, when it was simply a fashion.
As it became more obviously linked with racism and fascism I swapped for long
hair and flares.
--
Paul.
--------------------------------------------------------------
to look at
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 |
|