elag wrote:
> Paul Heslop wrote:
> >
> > Parry wrote:
> >
> > > elag wrote:
> > > > I'm not beyond feeling some apprehension based on people's appearance,
> > > > at times. After all, it is in part a defense mechanism,
> > >
> > > I also have an initial prejudice caused by certain ways of dress --
> > > particularly business suits, cop-military uniforms, and white collars or
> > > other religious regalia. Skin colour not so much, except for chemical
> > > tans.
> > >
> > > -- Parry
> >
> > yes, we're all probably guilty of that. We judge a lot by what people are
> > wearing... specially if that person wears denim, boots, has a shaved head
> > and a swastika tatoo.
>
> Hmmm... I love (black) denim and I always wear combat boots... I've had
> a (partly) shaved head. I wouldn't wear a swastika and I don't like
> what it stood for, but I've always kind of liked it as a design... and
> the fact that it shows up in nearly every culture on earth (I've seen
> them in Pompeii) and is still considered a sacred symbol among (for
> example) Hindus.
>
> I even made a veailed ref to these factoids in my thesis film, though I
> replaced swastikas w/ spirals. which are nearly as common.
>
> It's a shame a perfectly good symbol/design was ruined.
>
> --
> Replace "8" with "9" to reply.
Agreed. I was a skinhead, at least in appearance, when it was simply a fashion.
As it became more obviously linked with racism and fascism I swapped for long
hair and flares.
--
Paul.
--------------------------------------------------------------
to look at
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 |
|