Paul Heslop wrote:
>
> elag wrote:
>
> > Paul Heslop wrote:
> > >
> > > elag wrote:
> > >
> > > > Paul Heslop wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > elag wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > . Of course, the puns are often painful.
> > > > >
> > > > > Isn't that the whole point behind a pun?
> > > >
> > > > Well, some puns hurt more than others... I remember one spouted by Robin
> > > > (of Batman and...) as he jumps off a statue of a lion and kicks a crook
> > > > in the head he says: "my foot is LION on your jaw"... noe that's painful!
> > > >
> > > > I really like word play (if you couldn't tell) and I'm one of those few
> > > > that enjoys a good pun now and again... but puns have to be treated like
> > > > spices... usually a little goes a long way.
> > > >
> > > > Duchamp's puns for examply are often brilliant... and the Surrealists
> > > > were riddled with puns.
> > >
> > > I'm just into silly humour whatever it is. Serious discussions in other NGs
> > > are often brought to a grinding halt by someone's inclusion of a pun in a
> > > reply, setting a chain off.
> >
> > That doesn't bother me so much as the cats who think the be all and end
> > all of usenet existance is a cascade of n 0 n sequ1turs and gibberish.
> > A few silly puns never hurt anyone.
>
> Your cats use usenet?
I don't have any cats, but if I did I'd surely let them surf the web.
Too many webcats might be a catastrophe though.
Actually I was thinking more about the infamous "m e o w ers".
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 |
|