alt.surrealismPrev. Next
Re: 14 July 1789 blueyonder (post doesn't ..
Paul Heslop (paul.heslop@blueyonder.co.uk) 2003/08/06 17:15

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3F318C29.FB5B6BC3@blueyonder.co.uk>
From: Paul Heslop <paul.heslop@blueyonder.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.surrealism
Subject: Re: 14 July 1789
References: <3F124E55.A4BA3D3B@cloud9.net> <3F233CBB.AACBDDE4@cloud9.net> <3F233DF6.9D7385BD@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F273756.B7C9B520@cloud9.net> <3F27A50B.36F6DAE9@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F2A86FA.35A109F0@cloud9.net> <3F2AABB8.69A4ECB4@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F2DC935.A8BFB530@cloud9.net> <3F2E5981.5040101@citilink.com> <3F2E894A.2FB81F45@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F2E9E15.8050706@citilink.com> <sfomgb.0in.ln@moo.uklinux.net> <3F2FBC85.3090509@citilink.com> <3F2FBDD8.5EC305F9@blueyonder.co.uk> <cbfqgb.1qq.ln@moo.uklinux.net> <3F30D726.1A4A171F@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F311038.2050603@citilink.com> <3F31291C.570BDA2A@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F3145AE.6040102@citilink.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 35
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 23:15:54 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.39.104.77
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blueyonder.co.uk
X-Trace: news-text.cableinet.net 1060211754 82.39.104.77 (Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:15:54 BST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:15:54 BST
Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.surrealism:353

Dale Houstman wrote:

> > Yes, I know. I agree that there was a certain way of life, a lot of
> > which I don't actually recall thinking too much about. I guess as I
> > became interested at a very early age I was more concerned with the
> > visuals than with the philosophy. I've never been a greatly political
> > person (unless people like chuck or Josh get up my nose) and I'm not
> > really into destroying people's views on art just because they don't fit
> > my own.
>
> "Art" is precisely what surrealism was born to destroy: it is the
> commodification of imagination.
>
My point exactly. Although I enjoy the visual side of surrealism I don't
believe in the destruction of something which I enjoy. It's why i think
punk and grunge were bollocks. Although i enjoyed the music at times I
also enjoy Rock, which they tried to destroy.


> >
> > I don't see why it can't exist as it is, except people come in, read all
> > the in fighting and bugger off. Someone new enters the group and are
> > basically drawn into the fighting. Are any of us true surrealists?
>
> Good question of course. My answer? Yes - I am.
>
> dmh

In the full sense? I feel awful trying to fit myself into any bracket.
maybe that's better, I don't know.
--
 Paul. (I never agreed to be Your holy one)
 --------------------------------------------------------------
 Not what it seems...
 http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586878889
90919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119
120121122123124125126127
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite