<kinslerp@delillo.lsr.ph.ic.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:o7ifc4-he7.ln1@moo.uklinux.net...
> d.magitis <d.magitis@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> Sorry no climate prediction model here.
>
> Then you're hardly qualified to comment, are you? Perhaps you
> have other relevant expertise?
Please enlighten me and let me know who is qualified to accurately predict
the future.
>> I'd have more chance of predicting
>> the lottery and so would everybody else creating such models.
>
> OK, so no doubt you can despite the technicalities and accuracy
> of climate models with the best of them. Pick one from a well
> respected research group, and let's discuss it.
well respected research groups funded by governments no less, all eager to
join the bandwagon/cash machine. All glaring into there crystal balls
terrorising the general public with yet more rubbish.
http://www.predictweather.com/global_warming/index.asp
Oh and then there is the respectable Al Gore obviously a top expert in such
matters.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/harris061206.htm
They spoon it, you eat it and eat it all.
Some nice graphs.
http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/globalwarmA.html
>> Link of interest and debate:
>> http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/G/great_global_warming_swindle/index.html
>
> A contemporary TV documentary? And one deliberately titled for
> controversy? Yes, that's where we'll find reliable information,
> naturally. And apparently it turns it's viewers into experts!
Less prediction and more fact on past climate trends and analysis. No
crystal balls were harmed making this program. This weeks lottery numbers
are 6/10/27/28/38/44 bonus ball the globe dam it's hot. Trust me have a go.
2107 lottery numbers are 1/2/3/4/5/6 bonus ball 7. On a happier note mankind
will develop C02 inhibitor glands and have skin like leather, eyes that
block the suns rays and paddle feet.
I predict. I predict. I predict, respectively I predict.
>
>> <kinslerp@delillo.lsr.ph.ic.ac.uk> wrote in message
>> news:lstcc4-smf.ln1@moo.uklinux.net...
>> > d.magitis <d.magitis@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> Create a Myth and call it Global warming.
>> >> [...]
>> >
>> > I assume you're willing to provide details of your climate
>> > model, including how it agrees with past climate changes
>> > under the influence of environmental and solar changes.
>> > Once we can examine it, we can discuss how accurately
>> > you've describe the effect of cloud cover, for example,
>> > which is always tricky.
>> >
>> > #Paul
>
>
>
|
|