Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "d.magitis" <d.magitis@blueyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.surrealism
References: <YhmIh.59622$nW6.39838@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <lstcc4-smf.ln1@moo.uklinux.net>
Subject: Re: Global warming?
Lines: 25
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID: <dmXIh.100396$1E3.30744@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:53:13 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.31.113.188
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blueyonder.co.uk
X-Trace: fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk 1173635593 62.31.113.188 (Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:53:13 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:53:13 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.surrealism:2402
Hello Paul,
Sorry no climate prediction model here. I'd have more chance of predicting
the lottery and so would everybody else creating such models.
Link of interest and debate:
http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/G/great_global_warming_swindle/index.html
<kinslerp@delillo.lsr.ph.ic.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:lstcc4-smf.ln1@moo.uklinux.net...
> d.magitis <d.magitis@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> Create a Myth and call it Global warming.
>> [...]
>
> I assume you're willing to provide details of your climate
> model, including how it agrees with past climate changes
> under the influence of environmental and solar changes.
> Once we can examine it, we can discuss how accurately
> you've describe the effect of cloud cover, for example,
> which is always tricky.
>
> #Paul
|
|