Robert Morpheal wrote:
> Dale Houstman wrote:
>
>
>>Robert thinks that anything that is "obscure" must - by definition - be "deep." Even mud can run thin.
>
>
> Mud is very complex and potentially deep.
"Potentially" is the key word here: you may be ALL potential, but the
praxis is apparently fractured. All that oozes out is dust with a fading
memory of once being mud.
dmh
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 |
|