john adams wrote:
>
> Obscurantist, yes. Whether you risk the chance of talking over anyone's head is another matter. I think you simply have a greater chance of talking away heads with your intentionally obscure - but should I remind you meaningless (by design) - rhetoric. You might think you're being flashy and cunning, but in the end you're only fooling yourself...
I use it as people repellent, and I one day plan to bottle and market it
to the consumer public who have too many people fleas bothering them.
Charles Bukowski called the "people fleas".
He was mostly right about that.
Not only that but people expected Charles to be and behave a certain
way, and he had to comply with that in order to continue to sell books.
Imagine that.
R.M.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 |
|