| Re: Up Pops Oppenheimer |
Posted via Supernews, ht .. |
| john adams (johnqadamsiiinospam@minusthis.yahoo.com) |
2005/06/05 23:42 |
"Robert Morpheal" <morpheal@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:42A3CD22.F9253D9E@sympatico.ca...
> john adams wrote:
>
>> In other words you're full of hot air and the deeper meaning
>> that I had supposedly missed isn't within your grasp either, so
>> why not talk about nothing instead.
>
> I try to be as obscurantist as possible without talking over top of your
> and others' heads. Most often I succeed at that. Best of if neither of
> us really knows what the other is talking about. If it were any other
> way one or both might end up getting killed.
Obscurantist, yes. Whether you risk the chance of talking over anyone's
head is another matter. I think you simply have a greater chance of talking
away heads with your intentionally obscure - but should I remind you
meaningless (by design) - rhetoric. You might think you're being flashy
and cunning, but in the end you're only fooling yourself...
-john
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 |
|
|