Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <4244389A.8DF5F459@sympatico.ca>
From: Robert Morpheal <morpheal@sympatico.ca>
Reply-To: morpheal@sympatico.ca
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en]C-SYMPA (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,fr-CA
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.surrealism
Subject: Re: photography
References: <1111223172.376954.110110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <42418c8a$0$25038$8fcfb975@news.wanadoo.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 22
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:13:14 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.209.129.5
X-Complaints-To: abuse@sympatico.ca
X-Trace: news20.bellglobal.com 1111766611 216.209.129.5 (Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:03:31 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:03:31 EST
Organization: Bell Sympatico
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.surrealism:1800
verroust wrote:
> Of course, the most important surrealist photographer was Man Ray. But
you cannot ignore the photographic part of the Magritte's works (there
is presently an exhibition in Brussels), Hans Bellmer (very important),
l
Ubac, etc... A CDROM on Man Ray photographs was published there are few
Yes, but we should not really maintain the peculiar fashion of
idolizing dead movements, as a kind of violent closure against them.
For instance Joel Peter Witkin is a surrealist.
Among others.
R.M.
|
|