Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: elag <elag@cloud9.net>
Newsgroups: alt.surrealism
Subject: Re: 14 July 1789
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 01:47:58 -0400
Organization: Plus ca change plus c'est la meme chose
Message-ID: <3F1F7313.4BC48F49@cloud9.net>
Reply-To: elag@cloud9.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3F124E55.A4BA3D3B@cloud9.net> <44df026a.0307140902.56ad3c12@posting.google.com> <3F14BD7B.B816BADC@cloud9.net> <3qm9hvknftknf4e6erqug6hd58om7nof40@4ax.com> <3F150994.640B1A94@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F18C249.AC79B0EA@cloud9.net> <3F190219.7003F67B@blueyonder.co.uk> <3F1B5306.C464B853@cloud9.net> <3F1BD3A8.D8BB59A6@blueyonder.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 112
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.surrealism:177
Paul Heslop wrote:
>
> elag wrote:
> >
> > Paul Heslop wrote:
> > >
> > > elag wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Paul Heslop wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > prefuse 73 wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > lucat bene, der elag <elag@cloud9.net> goh, a hunnert truxx inero,
> > > > > > sumwit kowz n' sumwit duxx on Tue, 15 Jul 2003 22:50:43 -0400:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >Emilie Gruchow wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> If anything, Jefferson's manner of speaking certainly counters any
> > > > > > >> arguments that the founding father was a devoted man of the Christian
> > > > > > >> church. Though I do agree with his acceptance of humanity's tendency
> > > > > > >> to duke it out in large groups every 150 years or so, I would shy away
> > > > > > >> from assigning it to a higher calling of nature (ie Deism). I am not
> > > > > > >> completely dismissive of religion myself, though I am skeptical, but
> > > > > > >> conducting one's primeval head butting in the name of some higher
> > > > > > >> power seems a stretch even to the agnostics on this side of the pond.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Personally I'm agnostic, I don't believe in gods.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > based on what you've just typed, you are 'atheist'. *not 'agnostic'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > according to merriam-webster:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > an 'atheist' is someone that denies the existence of (a) god.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > an 'agnostic' either doubts the truth of religion (noun), or is one
> > > > > > that is uncertain of all claims to knowledge (adjective). an apropos
> > > > > > synonym would be 'doubter'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > so, what are you again?...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i, for one, am 'atheist'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > I always thought I was an atheist until I read that... now I doubt that
> > > > > I am :O)
> > > >
> > > > As Bunuel used to say: "Thank god I'm an atheist".
> > > >
> > > > As for me... I hold to Thomas Huxley's definition of agnosticism.
> > > > Huxley used "agnostic" to describe not a creed, but a method." This
> > > > method of thought
> > > > advocates that people "do not pretend that conclusions are certain which
> > > > are not
> > > > demonstrated or demonstrable." An agnostic doesn't necessarily believe
> > > > or disbelieve in a god -- he or she doesn't profess to know if there's a
> > > > god at all. Huxley's writings suggest that it's impossible to ever know
> > > > if a god exists or not.
> > > >
> > > > So, I would say I that I don't believe in gods, and that the existence
> > > > of gods is unknown and unknowable. An Atheist declares that there is no
> > > > god, which is somewhat different.
> > > >
> > > > This has been a public service announcement.
> > >
> > > :O) Sounds right for me then. I have often, in times of sorrow, wished
> > > there was a god, but I don't see much evidence of one.
> >
> > I never really wished for one, but I do find that the word comes up
> > distressingly often when I prick my thumb or stub my toe. I've tried to
> > switch to more amusing phrases like: "Oh Guard", "For Chrome's Sake",
> > "Dog Damn It"... but those don't come nearly as automatically.
>
> Doesn't quite have the same ring.
I could always go for "down home" expressions like: "dagnabit",
"Consarnit" and "tarnation". Those just roll off the tongue.
> As a youth I really didn't believe at
> all, but as I got older and my obsessions took over I guess it becomes
> harder to ignore the stuff. My OCD is what they call a superstitious
> OCD, meaning my mind will assume some disaster will befall me or others
> if I do or don't do certain things... I find it harder and harder to
> say, without a doubt, that God does not exist, that's when the panic
> sets in, like right now because I just wrote it :O)
I'm sorry to hear that, but at least you're aware of it. That's the
first step towards wiping it out.
> They must rake people in with OCD!
Probably... check out the film "Wiseblood".
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
| 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 |
|