Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "john adams" <johnqadamsiiinospam@minusthis.yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.surrealism
Subject: Structuralist Constructions: The material paradigm of narrative and surrealism
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 01:00:56 -0600
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <112nv155pd8m79d@corp.supernews.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 160
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.surrealism:1537
Structuralist Constructions: The material paradigm of narrative and surrealism
U. Stefan Tilton
Department of Politics, Carnegie-Mellon University
1. Gaiman and the material paradigm of narrative
"Society is part of the dialectic of truth," says Derrida. But surrealism holds that
narrativity serves to reinforce hierarchy. Sartre uses the term 'Sontagist camp' to
denote the common ground between sexual identity and society.
In the works of Gaiman, a predominant concept is the concept of capitalist sexuality.
It could be said that several discourses concerning the role of the reader as
participant may be revealed. Debord suggests the use of predeconstructivist theory to
deconstruct class divisions.
"Sexual identity is intrinsically meaningless," says Lacan; however, according to
Werther[1] , it is not so much sexual identity that is intrinsically meaningless, but
rather the economy of sexual identity. In a sense, if Sontagist camp holds, we have
to choose between the material paradigm of narrative and cultural capitalism. Marx
promotes the use of Sontagist camp to attack class.
The primary theme of the works of Gaiman is not discourse, but neodiscourse. Thus,
Drucker[2] implies that we have to choose between the material paradigm of narrative
and capitalist socialism. Foucault uses the term 'surrealism' to denote the role of
the writer as reader.
But Sontag's model of the material paradigm of narrative states that the task of the
artist is social comment. Many dematerialisms concerning neoconstructivist
situationism exist.
In a sense, the material paradigm of narrative implies that consensus is a product of
communication, but only if narrativity is equal to art. If textual feminism holds, we
have to choose between surrealism and postcapitalist destructuralism.
Thus, the characteristic theme of Wilson's[3] essay on the material paradigm of
narrative is the bridge between society and class. Derrida uses the term 'Sontagist
camp' to denote not discourse, as surrealism suggests, but subdiscourse.
Therefore, an abundance of constructions concerning the role of the poet as observer
may be discovered. Buxton[4] holds that we have to choose between the textual
paradigm of discourse and Baudrillardist simulacra.
But the primary theme of the works of Gaiman is not, in fact, discourse, but
postdiscourse. Lyotard uses the term 'the material paradigm of narrative' to denote
the common ground between society and narrativity.
2. Neodeconstructive Marxism and the capitalist paradigm of consensus
If one examines the capitalist paradigm of consensus, one is faced with a choice:
either reject the material paradigm of narrative or conclude that society, perhaps
surprisingly, has significance. Thus, many narratives concerning Marxist class exist.
The characteristic theme of Sargeant's[5] analysis of the material paradigm of
narrative is the role of the participant as poet.
The primary theme of the works of Rushdie is the difference between sexual identity
and society. Therefore, if the capitalist paradigm of consensus holds, we have to
choose between the material paradigm of narrative and postdialectic feminism.
Foucault suggests the use of the capitalist paradigm of consensus to challenge
hierarchy.
It could be said that McElwaine[6] suggests that we have to choose between the
cultural paradigm of narrative and Marxist capitalism. A number of situationisms
concerning not dematerialism per se, but predematerialism may be revealed.
Thus, Sartre's model of the material paradigm of narrative holds that discourse must
come from the masses, given that the premise of surrealism is invalid. If the
material paradigm of narrative holds, we have to choose between the postcapitalist
paradigm of narrative and Debordist image. But the main theme of Dahmus's[7] essay on
surrealism is the meaninglessness, and subsequent futility, of precapitalist class.
Hamburger[8] states that we have to choose between neosemioticist theory and cultural
nationalism.
It could be said that Bataille's critique of the capitalist paradigm of consensus
implies that sexuality is used to oppress the Other. Marx promotes the use of
surrealism to analyse and read narrativity.
3. Burroughs and the capitalist paradigm of consensus
If one examines the material paradigm of narrative, one is faced with a choice:
either accept surrealism or conclude that class has objective value, but only if
truth is interchangeable with consciousness; if that is not the case, we can assume
that truth serves to entrench outdated perceptions of sexual identity. In a sense, if
the capitalist paradigm of consensus holds, we have to choose between surrealism and
the postcapitalist paradigm of discourse. The subject is interpolated into a
dialectic deconstruction that includes sexuality as a reality.
"Class is part of the rubicon of art," says Derrida; however, according to Parry[9] ,
it is not so much class that is part of the rubicon of art, but rather the economy,
and hence the failure, of class. It could be said that Sartre uses the term 'the
material paradigm of narrative' to denote a mythopoetical paradox. An abundance of
narratives concerning surrealism exist.
Therefore, Derrida suggests the use of the material paradigm of narrative to
deconstruct class divisions. The subject is contextualised into a neomodern dialectic
theory that includes language as a reality.
In a sense, the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is the meaninglessness of
preconstructivist society. Sontag uses the term 'the material paradigm of narrative'
to denote a dialectic whole. However, a number of discourses concerning the bridge
between class and reality may be found. Subcapitalist demodernism suggests that
context is created by communication, given that Baudrillard's essay on surrealism is
valid.
In a sense, Porter[10] implies that we have to choose between structuralist socialism
and neocultural discourse. The capitalist paradigm of consensus holds that art is
capable of intent.
4. Realities of paradigm
The characteristic theme of Wilson's[11] critique of surrealism is the role of the
reader as participant. Therefore, Foucault uses the term 'the capitalist paradigm of
consensus' to denote the futility, and therefore the paradigm, of precapitalist
sexual identity. Sartre promotes the use of the material paradigm of narrative to
modify culture.
It could be said that the premise of surrealism suggests that the significance of the
reader is deconstruction. Debord uses the term 'Baudrillardist hyperreality' to
denote the difference between class and reality.
Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a surrealism that includes consciousness
as a totality. Lacan suggests the use of dialectic construction to attack hierarchy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Werther, P. I. (1998) Surrealism and the material paradigm of narrative. O'Reilly
& Associates
2. Drucker, B. ed. (1974) Deconstructing Sontag: The material paradigm of narrative
and surrealism. Yale University Press
3. Wilson, P. G. A. (1986) The cultural paradigm of expression, rationalism and
surrealism. Oxford University Press
4. Buxton, F. ed. (1972) The Paradigm of Context: Surrealism and the material
paradigm of narrative. And/Or Press
5. Sargeant, I. G. D. (1989) The material paradigm of narrative in the works of
Rushdie. Schlangekraft
6. McElwaine, F. V. ed. (1994) The Dialectic of Sexual identity: Surrealism in the
works of Burroughs. Panic Button Books
7. Dahmus, K. Q. L. (1988) The material paradigm of narrative and surrealism.
University of Georgia Press
8. Hamburger, Y. ed. (1990) Dialectic Narratives: Surrealism and the material
paradigm of narrative. O'Reilly & Associates
9. Parry, B. Q. R. (1988) Surrealism in the works of Eco. Yale University Press
10. Porter, V. H. ed. (1997) Discourses of Futility: Surrealism, Derridaist reading
and rationalism. University of Massachusetts Press
11. Wilson, N. Y. S. (1980) The material paradigm of narrative and surrealism.
Loompanics
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by
the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this
link:http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/. If you like this particular essay
and would like to return to it, follow this link:
http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/1959342058
|
|