Actually, it works the same as life. Everything is interpolated.
The very fact of finding meaning is itself interpolation. The
reading of a poem or piece of prose, or the hearing of a conversation
is never purely what it is, and cannot be purely what it is or was,
but the is that happens each time is interpolated anew. That is
how we create meaning from the given, by reading into it.
R.M.
Amathyzt wrote:
>
> Unfortunately I don't think you can say when it's okay to add
> or not, it was a poem wasn't it?
>
> The additional contributions are as valid as any critique aren't they?
> Moreso than most seen useless banter at the very least.
>
> Amathyzt
>
> "derek" <scefonas@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:WsIXc.243523$eM2.4261@attbi_s51...
> > Please don't crosspost my poems. I am cross-cross posting this time and
> one
> > more only to ensure that you may see it. If you wish to add, i ask that
> you
> > check to see if that is ok. Usually I will state whether or not a poem
> is
> > a corpse or not at the post's end.
> >
> > http://artlibre.org/licence.php/lalgb.html
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft
> >
> >
|
|