"Dale Houstman" <dmh7@citilink.com> wrote in message
news:403A02A0.1030905@citilink.com...
>
>
> john adams wrote:
> > "Parry" <parry@perfectOMITmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:4033F095.FCE@perfectOMITmail.com...
> >
> >>Andreas Moss wrote:
> >>
> >>>Thanks for a GREAT answer Parry.
> >>>Well, surrealism or surrealistic.. I don't really care. To me its just
a
> >>>keyword to finding movies I seem to enjoy. (Even though I would argue
on
> >>>early Lynch not being surrealism.., but thats not important..)
> >>>
> >>>May I add some questions?
> >>>
> >>>1. Why is Jean Cocteau a joke? I haven't seen anything with him, but I
> >>
> > heard
> >
> >>>he's done some good movies? Could you elaborate?
> >>
> >>He's a director who, in ancient times, would wrongly be labeled
> >>"surrealist." Surrealists hate him for being a pretentious,
> >>religionistic "fake poet."
> >
> >
> > I still think Blood of a Poet is great now and especially for its time.
> >
> > "..."
> >
>
>
> I think he made several interesting films, including "Beauty and the
> Beast" and "L'Enfants Terribles" but after reading his memoirs, I
> discovered he was an appalling lover of Nazi parties, luxury, and
> celebrities, a social-climber, and an elitist aesthete.
That's what I've heard. Not very much to be proud of, unless you
like nazi parties, celebrities, luxury, and elitism.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 |
|