On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:57:46 +0000 (UTC), ac <a@a.com> wrote:
Hey ac, I thought your "problem" was that I once posted a face pic
(head and shoulders to go with another leg pic without face) and that
the "face" pic was "off topic" under your definition?
No, it was because I was a "commercial" poster (like no pics are
commercial here, nor do you praise any)
No, maybe it was because I didn't support you when you were arguing
yenc with Stomp and Gandalf.
No, maybe it's just because you are intellectually dishonest as well
as just a dishonest troll. In every post, you try to egg people on
to fight each other in an effort to disrupt the group. You are still
crying over the fact that your long rambling and stupid discussions
when you first came to this group weren't welcomed, as well as your
pleas that that some off topic posts are good here.
That is the simple root of your anger, just admit it like a man rather
than whining and trying to "lash back" later like a immature crybaby.
>Dodger
>
>LOL
>you can lead a mule to water.....
>
>.....there are other commercial posters .....
>Take doc for instance (please) no one has ever, or will ever steal and
>re-post any of his stuff (even him!!).
>The quality is just too poor, the subjects too repetitive -
>(I've seen that toe from every conceivable angle - never much else ....
>just the toe) .....
>....... and how do we know she's wearing pantyhose?.... she could be
>wearing anything under all those clothes.
>
>......even teaser changes his subjects (I think).
>
>You've got to take it as a complement - yours are always nice subject
>....
>good quality - worth looking at ..... I always want to see more
>
>ac
|
|
')){kind=link}