On Tue, 31 May 2005 the king of Scotland , ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>Not true
>
>only DOC's posts are solely used as advertising for a commercial website. The
>others are good quality contributions which may have been taken by a pro ...
>and may include the photographer's details .... but only DOC's posts include a
>sales pitch
>(When I use STOCKINGS, I favour the classic RH&T and/or.....)
>and active links to this site .... that to me is the distinction.
So all of this nonsense is built on this pure bullshit or does "ac"
make up something new as he goes along when another theory fails?
It is a lie, not only does every site here does it to advertise, but
some use text in the body others put the sales pitch right in the
header, from "Tessa" you get this:
Tessa from highheels.com04.jpg (1/1) Fantasy Girl
Right in the header so you have to read it (unlike attached text).
Does "ac" flame their reposts? no
Dodger's broadband nylon repeating banners? Flamed by "ac", no.
Jb's ads for live web cam (text in the body, the distinction "ac" made
up). Ditto
Isabel's DVD Covers scanned and posted. Ditto
And this morning's post from Lycra Pavel:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005, LycraPavel <lycrapavel@NOSPAM.usa.net> wrote:
>Melissa, suntan Peavey Hosiery Hooters pantyhose
>
>Enjoy! to see more please visit
>
>http://www.pavelphoto.com/
>
>Pantyhose forever
>
>LycraPavel
Text in the picture post (not that you have to read it).
Day in and day out this is done, and yet "ac" comes up with a gay
deception, a simple lie, to the "but only DOC's posts include a sales
pitch".
AC = GAY DECIEVER = LIAR = HYPOCRITE
"and active links to this site .... that to me is the distinction."
The only one? A simple lie, a false distinction and evidence that ac
is so full of hatred that he will lie and come up whatever false
distinctions come up in his head at the moment. Many of these other
sites post more often than doc, or in some cases repost their reposts
more often but not a single word of complaint from ac.
AC = GAY DECIEVER = LIAR = HYPOCRITE
|
|