So now "ac" is saying doc doesn't post enough and you want volume? AC
is an idiot, a hypocrite and dishonest as I said before. Now ac is
also searching for phony distinctions with other posters because his
original "point" turned out to be damn stupid, dishonest and
unsupportable. You, ac, are a hypocrite asshole because you support
off topic cross postings by mudbone.
On Tue, 31 May 2005 13:31:48 +0000 (UTC), ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>Not true
>
>only DOC's posts are solely used as advertising for a commercial website. The
>others are good quality contributions which may have been taken by a pro ...
>and may include the photographer's details .... but only DOC's posts include a
>sales pitch
>(When I use STOCKINGS, I favour the classic RH&T and/or.....)
>and active links to this site .... that to me is the distinction.
>
>For SAM - yes I do make that distinction ... I'd rather see good or bad posts
>in reasonable volumes than DOC's meagre, poor quality purely advertising
>posts, The groups rely on volume .... not visa.
>
>You post to many groups .... as does Matilda and MUDBONE as well as many
>others ... you all have different styles and opinions on what goes where ....
>but the thing you all have in common.... is you post..... and don't expect
>something back.
>
>Show me any series of doc's, posted in the last two years which consists of
>more than 10 low quality promotional DVD grabs and perhaps 2 HQ pikkies. And
>I'll chew my own hand off.
>
>Subject: Re: Oldies - Pre-1998 - !ixOldies001.jpg - 002 of 101 - yEnc -
>134 K (1/1)
> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 00:26:43 -0400
> From: DOC <docREMOVEthis@it-smells.com>
> Organization: Unknown
> Newsgroups: alt.barefoot, alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.fetish.feet
>Note two NG's ... and how many *.JPG posts .... 5 - yes count them 5, none were
>barefoot.
>
>SAM - I've said my piece - This started because I contacted MUDBONE not doc
>...... DOC is in my exclusion list - as I agreed with you.
>When COSMO felt the need to comment - Closely followed by Gandalf.....
>His initial poorly orchestrated attack on me, which carefully excused MUDBONE
>as just harmless - (I guess so as not to incite more attention from that
>direction) - was obviously directed from elsewhere (D or G? I wonder?).
>
>But it meant I couldn't avoid seeing doc's post - so I REMed him - just to see
>- and then replied to the one without a forehead.
>If that's not allowed (and from what DOC said - it seems he at least thinks
>it's not) well sorry - in that case, occasionally I'll be off topic. 'cause I
>sure as hell will not avoid complementing posts, or agreeing (or disagreeing)
>with threads.
>If COSMO had kept out of this DOC's plea for sympathy wouldn't have been
>visible to me..... but it seems he want's to join the gang.... so...
>
>Sam while I have no argument with you ... and I do appreciate your efforts in
>this and many of the other groups (on and off the field) but...
>(for cosmo's benefit) - I don't expect, or require your approval ...
>I do have the right to free speech - however distasteful that is to "king doc"
>-
>and if cosmo wants to kiss his ring......
>(COSMO refers to MUDBONE as the "resident retard" and for me ...
>he has chosen to introduce "gay" into the argument (as did doc) ....
>I think what is said about homophobes should possibly be considered don't you
>cos?
>I've no real problem being called gay .... I'd much rather be described as gay
>..
>than being like cosmo - so it's a good swap) -
>
>But (and this is possibly another definition that you maybe think I don't fully
>understand) ... cosmo's choice of language and attitude must qualify him for
>his very own little troll bridge?) - or do trolls only come in one flavour
>here?
>
>Just don't expect me to watch silently.
>
>Now I'll delete the rems ....maybe add a couple of names .... and get on
>Fair enough??
>
>ac
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>cosmo wrote:
>
>> You are a jealous crybaby, ac. Why are you picking fights?
>>
>> Almost all of the posts in this group are commercial you idiot, and we
>> wouldn't have the group we got without pavel every day, the early
>> Cyberlegs stuff etc.
>>
>> Why are you so sore? What did doc say to you to make you cry? Why
>> did you argue with other people in here and not stop? If you have
>> issues in your life that make you angry and stupid, don't bring them
>> here, just go home and drink yourself to death, beat your dog, or
>> whatever to get back at whoever is giving you all these personal
>> setbacks.
>>
>> On Mon, 30 May 2005 19:55:32 +0000 (UTC), ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Cosmo
>> >
>> >You got me bang to rights
>> >
>> >I deferred to Sam I'm because he is a real poster, I agreed with Mudbone -
>> >because he is a real poster - and I agree with him.
>> >
>> >I disagreed in the past with Doc - because he IS a spammer.
>> >You on the other hand fit none of these categories ...... just a nothing
>> >.... so forgive me if I ignore you.
>> >
>> >And anyway, I'm not sure how to answer your gimlet insight into my
>> >personality.
>> >Have doc send me a list of acceptable topics so I know what I can and
>> >can't say (his 6 point plan was comprehensive on what not to say).
>> >So much for this being a rogue group .... I'll leave you and the "Yes"
>> >crowd to pat each other on the back.
>> >
>> >It's obvious that no-one is allowed to disagree or it seems even to agree
>> >with other posters in the group, or to message them, so what's the point?
>> >.....
>> >
>> >ac
>> >
>> >cosmo wrote:
>> >
>> >> Mudbone is harmless. Now that MikeMike is gone, he is just our
>> >> resident retard even though he means well. AC is some jealous asshole
>> >> who still seems unhappy after he came into the group expecting
>> >> everyone would agree with him all the time with his stupid fights. He
>> >> is still smarting and can't quit.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|
')){kind=link}