On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:11:10 -0500, "giga news" <shitbird@home.net>
wrote:
>But much much prettier.....
>Doc you sure go out of your way to state the obvious... If you don't like it
>why do you keep looking at the pictures? HMMMM got a little struggle going
>on in that little brain of yours?
><Doc@this-group.net> wrote in message
>news:dg81d39ldhpble0rvvfb66bhibdidkgeso@4ax.com...
>> As much of a man as Thomas Alva Edison.
Because you labeled it as a "female" naming him "Jessica", I was
fooled into clicking on one. One was enough but because of the
fraudulent labeling by you, you have to click to find out the
"obvious". it was not obvious from your label - indeed it advertised
it as a woman named "Jessica".
I don't care if you are as a gay as a republican senator toilet
pervert or not. I'm fine with live and let live for gays and support
reasonable laws to protect gays from hate crimes etc. But the issue
with the post was the FRAUD, with the gay issue not so important
except that it was part of the fraud. Indeed another person recently
posted something "Transsexuals in Pantyhose" and I did not bother to
flame that although I don't like that type of post. because it was
just one and labeled accurately, it was easy to bypass.
So go ahead and falsely raise the canard of homophobia. It doesn't
help your cause or point-of-view when you do so in an intellectually
dishonest manner. - Doc
|
|