Gandalph,
No trickery was intended. I THOUGHT that it was pretty obvious that she was
a tranny. I am new at this (relatively new anyway) and made the mistake of
assuming people would just move on if they did not like the pictures (as I
do).
I posted her pictures in some other groups (that had nothing to do with
trannys) and other than doc, no one said anything. Perhaps it was because
they were being nice...or perhaps it was becuase, even if they didn't like
the pictures, they figured (as I do) what was the point in wasting minutes
of their time and effort to say so. When the pictures will quickly move down
the list and fade into the vast hole that is the internet in a few
days....seems sort of pointless. However, since you have asked I will
happily
post "Tranny" in the header from now on.... Sorry for appearing to be
trying to mislead
"Gandalf" <gandalf@rivendell.bog> wrote in message
news:Lx6Ai.16364$SB3.10859@fe03.news.easynews.com...
> giga news wrote:
>> But much much prettier.....
>> Doc you sure go out of your way to state the obvious... If you don't like
>> it why do you keep looking at the pictures? HMMMM got a little struggle
>> going on in that little brain of yours?
>> <Doc@this-group.net> wrote in message
>> news:dg81d39ldhpble0rvvfb66bhibdidkgeso@4ax.com...
>>> As much of a man as Thomas Alva Edison.
>
> Maybe he was simply giving a heads-up to the newbies?
>
> Posting these without putting tranny/tv or some warning in the subject is
> deliberately deceiving.
>
> Why do you feel you must hide and trick and the innocent?
>
> --
> -Gandalf
>
> Never meddle in the affairs of a dragon for you are crunchy and taste good
> with ketchup!
|
|