Doc wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:19:08 +0100, ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>
> >Doc wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:46:14 +0100, ac <a@a.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Doc wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:23:48 +0100, ac <a@a.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Doc wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:22:04 +0100, ac <a@a.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >Doc wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:47:40 +0100, ac <ac@ac.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >she's wearing jeans for god's sake !!
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >ac
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> LOL, here we go again, a couple weeks of quiet and ac returns to
> >> >> >> >> whine.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Perhaps Ohmster will take the time to "explain" to ac but frankly it's
> >> >> >> >> just a waste of time because no explanation will ever satisfy ac. He
> >> >> >> >> doesn't really care about whatever silly "issue" he may happen to
> >> >> >> >> raise anyway - there have been no similar complaints by him about
> >> >> >> >> other posters - this is strictly only about him trying to seek
> >> >> >> >> personal "revenge" against me for 3 years because I exposed him as an
> >> >> >> >> ass after he got to this group and began telling others what to do and
> >> >> >> >> how to post, along with arguing stupidly about yenc (which he
> >> >> >> >> hypocritically has since posted in).
> >> >> >> >> --
>
> >> >> >> >Doc
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >You've never been frank in your life
> >> >> >> >and the only thing you've exposed ...... is yourself in the local park
> >> >> >> >thing is no-one noticed ... they just thought you were holding a
> >> >> >> >cigarette.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >How about arguing for yEnc when you refuse to use it yourself?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >but ..... Perhaps you *** could *** explain ?
> >>
> >> No one owes any explanations to a retard that can't accept
> >> explanations anyway because he will argue ad nauseam. I argued for the
> >> ability of posters to use whatever they want, yenc or not, while you
> >> were telling them what to do.
> >>
> >> >> >> >This is your marketing strategy after all .... how and why should people
> >> >> >> >buy from you when your subject matter doesn't get close to hitting the
> >> >> >> >topic and have no respect for your customers.
> >> >> >> >(was she wearing nylons doc? .... was she?)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >endless re-posts ... off topic spam ....
> >> >> >> >all archived and saved (by accident?!!!)
> >>
> >> We'll have to repost the material so people can determine for
> >> themselves how off topic or on topic is it. Of course pics such as
> >> these have been on topic for about 10 years before ac got here, but ac
> >> wishes to dictate new standards for alt.pantyhose.
> >>
> >> >> >> >what happens in docland?
> >> >> >> >I'd love to see inside your head .... that vast unbroken plain - there
> >> >> >> >must be so much room for all your imaginary friends!
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >You may be happy to know ...
> >> >> >> >it ends here ...
> >> >> >> >no more flame wars ....
> >>
> >> That's a joke. Ac has been engaged in constant flame wars from soon
> >> after he arrived here. Last 3 years with me, but originally not with
> >> me, but rather a few other long time regulars here. The reason he's
> >> been "stuck" on me is that I intervened in his never-ending stupidity
> >> with others.
> >>
> >> As we approach the 3 year mark, maybe I'll repost some of ac's old
> >> harangues against Stomp, Lycra Fan, Gandalf and Sam. At that time ac
> >> never flamed me or my pics, including foot pics. It wasn't until
> >> after I got sick of his constant flame wars and intervened to bitch
> >> slap ac down as another troll in our history of trolls.
>
> >> >> >> >just questions .... like how is a pair of jeans on topic?
>
> >> Like a pair of earrings, retard.
> >>
> >> >> >> >why don't you post a contribution rather than just spam
> >> >> >> >why does gandalf accept your movies ....
> >> >> >> >but complain about every one else's
> >> >> >> >None of which you'll answer ...
> >>
> >> Because ac is an ass in every way and so it's not "acceptable"? Just
> >> a wild guess.
>
> >> >> >> How about it? I argued for the right of a poster to use whatever he
> >> >> >> wanted, yenc or no yenc but you argued against yenc, and this is what
> >> >> >> it all started over, and since then you've used it yourself. You just
> >> >> >> wanted to tell people what to do from when you first got to the group
> >> >> >> and got frustrated when it didn't work and were labeled an asshole.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> So now ac you continue this for 3 years because it's simply stupid and
> >> >> >> personal now. That's the most "frank" thing anyone can say. It's just
> >> >> >> obvious. You are a sore loser ac and a baby because grown-ups normally
> >> >> >> get over things like that.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> It festered in you so long. Obviously you couldn't wait to get back
> >> >> >> from your holiday and come up with a new charge to finally "get" me
> >> >> >> just like the stupid shit from last month claiming I used my foot
> >> >> >> instead of Arianna's in a post etc. When that fails and you ac look
> >> >> >> like an ass, you have no shame and just come up with another equally
> >> >> >> stupid accusation. It never ends. Anyway, here it is, ac is back from
> >> >> >> vacation, ready to blather and waste time in his endless personal
> >> >> >> jihad.
>
> >> >> >doc
> >> >> >
> >> >> >you tire me
> >> >> >you have nothing to say ...
> >> >> >and you obviously have no idea what is and has been said
> >> >> >so you quote your own versions of reality
> >> >> >I actually said that it ***could*** have been anyone's foot - even yours.
> >> >> >boycott ID the foot because of her circus toe (lol - good one boycott).
> >> >> >and on past evidence you ***could*** quite easily look back through your
> >> >> >archives
> >> >> >(jeezus that never ceases to creep me out [shudder])
> >> >> >to confirm that (you did after all try to (mis)"quote" a post from way back in
> >> >> >2004......
> >> >> >you even keep trying to resurrect the yEnc thing
> >> >> >
> >> >> >perhaps it's you who should move on doc ....
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On the subject of feet ... this isn't a foot group ... it's a pantyhose group
> >> >> >... ... but subject/spam on/off topic new/repost are all mysteries to you ...
> >> >> >so I guess it's not not worth more words
> >> >> >
> >> >> >go back to spamming the groups pretending to be a benefactor - posting nothing
> >> >> >new - or of value
> >> >> >look at my 2 pictures.... buy my goods
> >> >> >remember 2004??
> >> >> >
> >> >> >ac
> >> >>
> >> >> There were 2 pics. There was room for 2 foot and jean pics on this
> >> >> group, just like room for encased pantyhose, ripped pantyhose, wet
> >> >> pantyhose, crotch only pantyhose, tits and pantyhose or anything else
> >> >> as long as it doesn't dominate and choke off the rest.
> >> >>
> >> >> In fact the person (Ohmster) ac asked to comment or "explain" about
> >> >> whether the pic was on topic praised the very same pic in another
> >> >> pantyhose group.
> >> >> And yet another specifically asked for jeans and pantyhose the week
> >> >> before. So should ignore them and listen to the stupid yapping dog
> >> >> named ac? Ac did try to give orders to this long established group
> >> >> soon after arriving in 2004.
> >> >> They count, ac, you don't. The subject of the post was clear. AC, you
> >> >> could have skipped the 2 pics instead of being an ass (again).
>
> >> >> So why ac did you so dishonestly charge that Arianna's foot "could"
> >> >> have been my foot? Were you really talking about mathematical
> >> >> possibilities or is this just another way a pathological liar tries to
> >> >> weasel out when caught (again)?
> >> >>
> >> >> AC has no shame. He is willing to look like a complete retard over
> >> >> and over if only once he could come up with some "charge" against me
> >> >> that someday someone might buy or believe. Even over 2 pantyhose and
> >> >> jeans pics. Or the idea that I substituted my foot for Arianna's on a
> >> >> close-up (for no good reason).
>
> >> >> Retarded shit but that's ac, still pissed off after 3 years because I
> >> >> personally embarrassed him here after he started picking fights with a
> >> >> couple other regulars. Ac lost any sense of shame and will do (and
> >> >> say) anything know, no matter how retarded) in his childish revenge
> >> >> quest.
>
> >> >difference was ... the other pikkies from the other posters
> >> >you mention showed a little flesh ... and were unarguably pantyhose pics.
> >> >
> >> >yours on the other hand .... well she ***could*** have been wearing anything ... it
> >> >was just a pikkie of a chick ... no fetish orientation other than your words ... no
> >> >one could possibly have determined what ... if any fetish was represented without
> >> >them.
> >> >
> >> >same with the pikkies of the park bench
> >> >(still would like to know if they were nylons)
> >> >and the above hemline landscape .... wtf?
> >>
> >> Retard praises posters Paulio, Nevyn, Hudson etc in the past, all of
> >> whom have posted many similar pics. From when we first started
> >> posting pictures in this group, there was never a requirement, nor was
> >> there even ever an argument, about pics like that. Now the genius ac
> >> arrives to impose a new standard. LOL
>
> >> >which is it doc .... are you a liar? .... just stupid? .... or as it looks here ...
> >> >a stupid liar?
> >> >(pretty dumb when what you are misquoting is at the top of the post.)
> >> >
> >> >>>>praised the very same pic in another pantyhose group
> >> >oh yea? - which one?
> >>
> >> alt.binaries,pictures.pantyhose you dumbass, how many times are you
> >> willing to be shamelessly proven to be a retard?
> >>
> >> >>>>And yet another specifically asked for jeans and pantyhose the week
> >> >>>>before
> >> >oh yea - who?
> >>
> >> "Oh yea" LOL. Here we go again.
> >>
> >> White Zombie, another long time regular, and former major scanner and
> >> poster. Something you wouldn't know about. Guys like that have
> >> opinions that count while retards like ac that show up to tell other
> >> long timers here what to do don't count. It's that simple.
> >>
> >> >let's see how good your archive is
> >>
> >> You don't need an archive to Ohmster's post a day or 2 ago. WZ's post
> >> would also still be visible with a good ISP.
>
> ---- ----- ------ ---- Pertinent Part Above running dozens of
> lines, and ac's latest:
>
> >I think you are making it up
> >not visible to me ... nor to google
> >
> >why not humiliate me by posting ohm and wz's requests and praise
> >
> >ac
>
> LOL ac, you are so far beyond any more humiliation. You've lost
> everything already. You have no shame left so it doesn't cost you to
> continue to be retarded.
>
> No, like last time with the hemline phony "issue" of last month, I'll
> let you invest a week or 2 into your retarded arguments first.
>
> Besides other people can see them on their own first, while you can
> continue to argue that they don't exist.
>
> When will your continued humiliation end, ac?
>
> Maybe you should just follow your post of yesterday:
> >> >> >> >You may be happy to know ...
> >> >> >> >it ends here ...
> >> >> >> >no more flame wars ....
> >> >> >> > ac
>
> But we all knew that was a joke and a lie, forgotten within a day, as
> ac continues his 3 year temper tantrum.
>
> So instead of shifting to yet another phony "issue", stick with this
> one awhile longer ac. Once you are beaten to a pulp (again) you will
> just come back with something equally dishonest and retarded next
> time.
> --
> The Source For Premium Newsgroup Access
> Great Speed, Great Retention
> 1 GB/Day for only $8.95
you doc - you just lie
if they existed ... you'd post them ... they don't so you try to cover your lies with empty
rhetoric
ac
|
|
 - in return - can anyone explain to me how doc's latest post is on topic? - thumbs20070718142754.jpg (0/1)')){kind=link}