DOC wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2005 18:34:29 -0400, "Sens Fan Happy In Ohio"
> <GoingForTheCup@GoSensGo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>In news:vjil815f1nbuqdt7hmdfhkoe9pc8hip07l@4ax.com, DOC
>><docREMOVEthis@it-smells.com> first attempted to communicate with pen, but
>>the writing was small, so next used sidewalk chalk, but the rain washed it
>>away, and then switched to spray paint and stencils but the cans exploded,
>>so placed fingers to keyboard for this:
>>
>>>I like the Downtown ones better than the others found on the web or
>>>the parties.
>>>Lighting and clarity better. This girl is actually decent looking
>>>too. Of course they'd be pretty pissed if they found out someone was
>>>posting them up on the web.... Doc
>>
>>Thanks Doc. I prefer the downtown ones too, especially if the photographer
>>gets nice close-up ones of the woman in question. Sometimes the ones I find
>>are in sets and the photo I happen to click on is great but the rest suck
>>and I don't know it until they post. Many of the people who help me take
>>some of these too and do a fine job! I just wish I lived in a place where
>>legs were readily available. But at work the "attire" is akin to beachwear
>>... shorts and flip-flops. Not very office like and pantyhose are only worn
>>for funerals.
>
>
> Anything unposed it's tough to get close-ups. Big citries tend to be
> more formal work-wise. Hope we don't have to start hanging out at
> funerals.
LA sure isn't:(
But why is it that women only dress sexy for funerals?
|
|
')){kind=link}