Gandalf wrote:
> ac wrote:
> > so gand
> >
> > just ignore me! ... easy eh?
> > better than outright lies - especially such easily discredited ones
> >
> > Obviously you should have said you didn't know ... 'cause you obviously
> > don't
>
> <snip references>
>
> > on the other hand
> > the original glyph was added to the typographers collection in the late 16th
> > century ....
> > slightly earlier.than your pathetic attempt at one upping
> >
> > just 'cause you no likee me doesn't mean you can re-write history
> > using "bigger sounding names" doesn't discredit a fact either
> >
> > if you are going to be an arse ... at least be an accurate arse ...
> >
> > you get more like doc every day .... I suppose your archives are up to date?
> >
> > when will the spam start?
> >
> >
> > ac
>
> I'm not above eating crow when presented with proof of error.
> Unfortunately I repeated something told me by a trusted source.
> [English professors. Go figure!]
>
> Shit happens, ya know?
>
> But my recant is for benefit of the group.
> I *do* strive for accuracy.
>
> And you're right...I don't like you.
>
> --
> -Gandalf
>
> Never meddle in the affairs of a dragon for you are crunchy and taste
> good with ketchup!
Back at you - Me neither .... but is takes a man to back down ....
that I can respect
ac
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|