Doc wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:53:46 +0000, ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>
> >G
> >
> >Back at you .... thanks for an honest and rational reply of the [facts] .... as you
> >see them
> >hell I agree with most of them
> >
> >1 last reply.... no frill or flames
> >Nice to see a rational reply here for once
> >however the fact that you've felt the need to intercede on doc's behalf is possibly
> >more telling than what you say
> >as is the fact you seem to know his motives better than he does himself
> >
> >I agree we are never going to agree about much.
> >We got off on the wrong foot .... and first impressions .....
>
> Wow gandalf, 3 years ago ac was screaming at you, a few posts ago he
> was getting familiar with you calling you "Gand" and now, "G".... What
> next, a kiss if he could somehow "turn" you (or anyone) against his
> nemesis?
>
> Then perhaps he is suggesting you are really me? He has suggested that
> kind of stuff before.
>
> Finally he agrees that "we" got off on the "wrong foot" and yet he
> goes on for hundreds of lines of endless harangues in this and other
> posts for years. If ac would simply move on off his old anger like
> any normal human being would do and let go of his rage, his endless
> air pollution here and time wasting can end.
>
> Maybe ac should adopt a puppy or a better yet a gerbil or something if
> he doesn't have any family or friends and get some perspective that
> his time wasting vitriol and 2+ year quest to get back at people is
> kind of unbalanced.
Doc
You seem able to run two threads at once .... I suppose your voices help you there.
I'll just explain a couple of issues (again) and then I think you'd better go sit some
where quiet
>>>> Finally he agrees that "we" got off on the "wrong foot"
not "we" - as in you and I ... I was talking to gandalf .... I meant him and me ...
I know you think everything revolves round you ... but it doesn't
yes I was a little sore at him criticising my first post ....
but hell that was a long time ago (I think you said it was 2004?[lol])
and we have on a couple of occasions communicated without any heat
since.
It's where you are concerned that the whole thing goes to the dogs
G from time to time defends you ... and I from time to time snipe back at him - that's
the way it is.
you on the other hand have chosen to create a pure fantasy land .... where hate and
duplicity reign.
a little like the wizard of oz ...
where you are the wicked witch of the west ...
spreading your evil spam and sniffing the ruby slippers
(I suppose you'd say I was Toto - the humping dog .... lol)
but it's your ass I have my teeth into .... no Korn anywhere
>>>>Wow gandalf, 3 years ago ac was screaming at you, a few posts ago he
>>>>was getting familiar with you calling you "Gand" and now, "G".... What
>>>>next, a kiss if he could somehow "turn" you (or anyone) against his
>>>>nemesis?
Wow doc ... you promote yourself to nemesis (what a surprise!!!)
and are you doubting Gand (or G as I like to call him now - I may try "alf" at some later
date also)?
you paranoia is showing in more that one place now.
I seriously doubt that G and I will become friends ... nor is he likely to turn his back
on you
.... Gan simply refuses to "pet the troll" ... so there has never been much screaming ...
he always tends just to say his bit and then disappears.
(and no I'm not trying to suck the Korn from his ass ...
he pisses me off when he defends you ... and sometimes in his own right - and his summing
up certainly did me no favour ...
despite it being subsequently being proved wrong (thanks again for that doc ... I
couldn't have done it without you).
It's you who plays the hissy drama queen ... that's why I think of you as my little pet
performing monkey.
G is a loyal sort ... like him or not ... he shows he has some integrity even if he
sometimes lacks good judgement where you are concerned.
..... when it's needed he can drop out of the game and talks straight.
He latched on to the deeper significance of your archives
and came out of the game and tried to persuade me (on your behalf) and anyone sad enough
to be following this thread .... that you were using google ....
(I assume because he also thought that the archive option is as creepy as I do)
.... trying to minimise the damage you were doing to yourself by assuring me that he knew
that wasn't the case ..... that I was wrong .... and that you were normal.
..... but you just couldn't resist giving in to your urge to make your point - having
totally missed the real point
and in doing so have destroyed his attempt and discredited his best intentions.
>>>> he goes on for hundreds of lines
little difference between us there ...
it's just you keep deleting parts of the threads so that your version of the "facts"
aren't damaged by what was actually said.
I'll also apologise for not replying to you instantly (twice now)
I do have a life .... and I prefer to be with my family .... I save you for a little
mid-shift diversion ....
so I reply when I don't have anything better to do.
I'm sure you on the otherhand will fire yet another of your fearsome lampoons immediately
you read this .....
just let me say ... try to avoid hitting your foot this time.
seriously doc .... have your say ... and then let's take a break ....
I'm getting concerned that you are getting out of your depth with this hate and
conspiracy stuff.
it sounds as if you actually believe it - why else have you kept records?
which despite what you casually claim seem to have endured more than one or two software
updates ... as well as machine (of your choice) change overs.
I do enjoy the sport .... but I'm not out to cause real harm
I quite like the idea of being an old humping dog ...
.... better than being an impotent fruitcake
I'm sure this isn't the end of your spamming ways ... or of my stick
ac
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|