Doc wrote:
>
> Here is typical drivel from "ac", here against the best regular poster
> at the time, Sam I'm.
> He also took his normal shots against other long term regulars,
> Gandalf and Stomp despite just arriving here (no shot yet against me -
> in fact there was none till I spoke up to support Sam).
>
> Note the same silly style of flaming agaainst others:
>
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 00:35:39 +0000 (UTC), ac <a@a.com> wrote:
>
> >Sam
> >
> >Venerable oldster - I quiver before your omnipotence .... no sorry .....
> >that should read impotence
> >Is one of the definitions of oldster - delusional? Gandalf believes he
> >intimidates people, Stomp, that he is an intellectual ocean.
>
> >If your measure of a man (or woman) is his ability to use a piece of
> >software, and a joy of jumping in to abuse anyone who dares to disagree with
> >their blinkered view of what "ought" to be right. - I'm proud to be regarded
> >as a troll. (I thought that the view that best is always best was both naive
> >and touching - or would have been if expressed by a five year old - from an
> >adult ....well bush probably thinks the same...)
> >
> >Dam right this post wasn't meant for you.....you are of course welcome to
> >join in on the debate but.....
> >The guy should be able to answer for himself ... I guess that based on his
> >last and most spectacular effort you are afraid he has already discredited
> >his plausibility and may well continue and discredit the whole yenk thing
> >
> >Therefore you seek to try some sort of damage limitation.
> >
> >HaHA!n (to quote you)
>
> (note also this was all about yenc, a standard the troll ac posted in
> the last time he posted content here like a week or 2 ago (hypocrite)
>
> Again, it's not really the content or merit of any argument, it's just
> argument for arguments sake, a newbie to a group trying to tell others
> what to do, and it's about ac's constant diarreah of flames and
> yapping. AC must think he is a brainy intellectual but instead he
> resembles the other end of the human anatomy.
Doc
I see as usual you've abandoned the current thread to throw up this
smokescreen to try and divert attention from your shabby practices
and that was to be expected .... its what you do (next will be the korn
thing I guess).
I don't remember this particular post so it's difficult to comment ....
2004 was such a long time ago
..... Why do you keep posts from so far in the past? ..... seems more
than a little sad
(and you're sort of creeping me out the more I think about it).
However it is significant that you've had to go so far back to even find
something that could be edited to fit your requirement.
So .... a couple of points which are glaringly obvious
1. you have edited this reply (as you always do - when have I ever
limited myself to such a short reply?) - thus the overall context has
been removed along with the other 7 parts of the debate .... as well as
the certainty that that it is indeed sam
.... I suppose this is as you intended.
I doubt it would be accepted by any court of law
But from this ....
> >Dam right this post wasn't meant for you.....you are of course welcome to
> >join in on the debate but.....
I assume that the post wasn't actually aimed at sam ....
I'm guessing it was for stomp .. (another old regular non-poster)?
2. The yEnc posts .... my argument has always been against yEnc .... I
agree so far ....
The protocol ***was*** developed for multimedia posts and not JPGs. ---
look at your records.
Yes I posted (and will in the future) multimedia content using yEnc ..
largely as a consideration for those who may want to d/l the file.
I suppose to some extent I've accepted defeat on that front - for others
- sheer weight of numbers.
But back to your archive
****I have never - ever***** (nor will I *******ever****** posted JPGs
using yEnc
The reality is I've posted so few you should have no problem verifying
this.
If you want a definition of hypocrisy .... how about someone who argues
**for** the standard ..... but never uses it himself (you never use it
do you?) .... what's that about? ...... anyone?
You comment on the "free pass" .... well they have more sense than to
enter into the fray .... so what would be my motivation?....
you on the other hand (despite good advice from gandalf) provide a
ceaseless source of distraction (even though your logic is more first
grade rather than first class)
Doc .... this has always boiled down to a did-do argument
you are quick to tell everyone what you ***** DID ***** in the 90s
...... but what do you ****DO**** for the group *****now**** .... and
for the last few years ...
except post and cross post the same tired 20 pikkies?
and offer advice to newbs by referring people to "special" parts of your
***commercial*** website
ac
|
|