CQ <cappynospamcue@yahoo.com> pondered, puzzeled, prognosticated
(perhaps even premeditated), and then, in a very wise voice, sed: :
>In a previous post, chris said...
>
>> CQ <cappynospamcue@yahoo.com> pondered, puzzeled, prognosticated
>> (perhaps even premeditated), and then, in a very wise voice, sed: :
>
>Ooohh...wow, is that ever profound, Chris. How long did it take you to
>look up all those big words and why don't you at least spell them all
>correctly?
Is there some point to this? Or are you just going on with your Dubya
act? Does what you wrote somehow make you feel superior?
Self-reighteous? Why would you think i would have to look up such
trival words? Would *you* have to?
>> Just because he has an opinion different from yours?
>
>No, because he thinks his opinion is the only one that is significant.
But apparently you do too. That was my point!
>> Christ! Who the
>> fuck are you? George Bush?
>
>If you have something to add then by all means feel free to add it.
>Hopefully if you *puzzle* over it for a while you can come up with
>something that makes a bit more sense than asking me if I am George Bush.
>I prognosticate that you won't be able to, though.
i thought the Dubya analogy worked pretty well. Arrogant, lacking
ability to see past his own criminal nose. i still stand by it.
>I'm no more significant to the RIAA or the rest of the world than he is.
>I haven't set myself up as the moral watchdog of the world, though, as
>he has, and am happy to realize that all I am is a small cog in the
>workings of a universe that will go on with or without me and my
>opinions. Ponder that for a bit.
i've pondered insignificance--my own individual insignificance,
humankind's insignificance, and even the insignificance of the whole
of reality as i know it--enough to realize that *everything* i know
could be wrong. Therefore, i don't come out with my insults afire when
someone sees things from another point of view. Apparantly, you are
threatened by his alternative viewpoint, or, contrary to your above
words, think that your opinion is actually *quite* significant, and is
enough to warrant cutting him down with unbased insults.
>At least I do have some opinions and they are based on some sort of
>knowledge and thought, though. That a problem for you, Chris?
No, it's not a problem for me for you to have opinions. It's just your
heavy-handed, holier-than-thou, insulting demeanor. It's like trying
to argue with Rush Limbaugh.
=========
Now Playing: "He'd Send in the Army" -- Gang of Four
--
chris
"Nothing is real."
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
|