"CQ" <cappynospamcue@yahoo.com> wrote
< a brilliant "cyber-nalysis" >
in message
news:MPG.198a86317f6ead989897ec@news.cis.dfn.de...
< re-posted below >
Dear Jesse -
It could be some repressed sexual expression on your part that's
responsible for your lack of coherent thought, understanding and
expression - so, my only solace in *that* concept is the possibilty you
will never procreate.
Err... that's not too much to hope for, is it?
- Loco -
(Now Playing: Sex Drive - Grace Jones)
> In a previous post, Jesse said...
>
> > Follow the thread jack ass.
>
> Ooh, not only a tight assed moralist but an eloquent one, too. You need
> to follow the thread, Jesse. Here, I'll help you. The Rev said this:
>
> "sodomy (defined in Virginia, for example, as applying to oral
> sex between a married couple) was illegal"
>
> Now, note if you will that he says specifically that he is referring to
> sodomy AS DEFINED IN VIRGINIA which involves a *married couple*. See
> that?
>
> Then you come back with this:
>
> "Well if your talking about a guy blowing another guy,that in my
> opinion is completely unjustifiable,but thats another matter.
> That law was obviously slanted towards gays,"
>
> You being the very first one to take the thread into the realm of graphic
> descriptions of gay sex acts, a realm you seem to insist on staying in.
>
> > You might think it just fine for a guy to stick his greased up schlong
> > up a hairy bung hole.
> > I don't ,
>
> But, why are you so hung up on it then, Jesse? The subject was
> downloading music until you took a sharp right turn down homophobia lane
> and started gracing everyone with your descriptive visuals here.
>
> > and definitely think species threatening behavior such as this
>
> Oh, that's enlightened.
>
> > should certainly not be given any legal\government acceptance in any
> > form whatsoever -
>
> Well, you seem to be out of luck. Too bad for you that you weren't born
> in the last century when more people would have bought into your sorry
> attitudes. My own government seems to have better things to do, thank
> you.
>
> > And generally should not be encouraged as all you
> > liberal asswipe open minded dreamers do.
>
> Hmm. Again with the anal fixation. You know, I'm beginning to wonder
> about you Jesse, old son. You seem, well, how to put this, a bit stuck
> on the ass thing here. How's that?
>
> > Thats my last comment now STFU dipstick.
>
> STFU Dipstick? heh heh. Is that a polite way of saying "shut
> the fuck up, dipshit" so as not to offend anyone with your off-color
> language after the rest of your graphic and obscene diatribe? What a
> hypocritical moralistic asshole.
>
> Unfortunately for you, and fortunately for the rest of the world, your
> hypocritical "traditional family values" type of attitude is in the teeny
> tiny little minority in this day and age and people are recognizing the
> fact that private behavior amongst consenting adults is none of anyone
> else's fucking business.
>
> Have a nice night dreaming about all those greased up schlongs out there
> just itching to get a shot at your hairy bung hole, Jesse.
>
> Me, I'm going to bed with my wife. ;-)
> --
> CQ
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|