Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: flip <flippo@mac.com>
Newsgroups: alt.music
Subject: Re: July/August RIAA Boycott
References: <f5d4705a.0307120543.62961da1@posting.google.com> <3F128207.5352EFED@mymail.com> <88494a63.0307141056.48503d4c@posting.google.com> <3F12FFA6.10102@hotmail.com> <5d5d68dc.0307221218.41ea8851@posting.google.com> <flip-DFEF2E.15224422072003@nnrp05.earthlink.net> <MPG.198787a56a5cf29b989693@news.easynews.com> <flippo-9B824C.21441422072003@news.central.cox.net> <3LKdnfJ9kdnMXYOiXTWJhw@comcast.com> <flip-D1A4B4.14475123072003@nnrp05.earthlink.net> <332dnVDAG7Zq_YKiU-KYvw@comcast.com> <flippo-FD773D.06290224072003@news.central.cox.net> <7Q-dnUUvXYconr2iXTWJkQ@comcast.com> <flip-B37B75.14034024072003@nnrp04.earthlink.net> <bfpqrt$hnd8v$1@ID-83907.news.uni-berlin.de> <flippo-24731A.18490624072003@news.central.cox.net> <MPG.198a4eff229554f69897e9@news.cis.dfn.de>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.3b1 (PPC Mac OS X)
Message-ID: <flippo-D3CCAC.21490524072003@news.central.cox.net>
Lines: 52
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 02:49:12 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.12.48.71
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net
X-Trace: news1.central.cox.net 1059101352 68.12.48.71 (Thu, 24 Jul 2003 22:49:12 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 22:49:12 EDT
Organization: Cox Communications
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.music:76
In article <MPG.198a4eff229554f69897e9@news.cis.dfn.de>,
CQ <cappynospamcue@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In a previous post, flip said...
>
> > They've apparently determined that the market price is what it is.
>
> Oh for crying out loud. Of course it is "what it is". Why is it "what
> it is" though? It is "what it is" because the price was illegally fixed
> at "what it is".
That doesn't make sense. If the price was fixed at something other than
the market level, once you remove the fixing, the price should adjust.
>
> > No need for price fixing.
>
> No, there is no further need at this time for any gasoline, the whole
> fucking house in in flames.
>
> You are a treasure, flippo.
I see you haven't been able to come up with any rational arguments.
>
> > Sure there's a reason. That's the price that non-thieves are willing to
> > pay.
>
> This attitude you so happily accept like a good sheeple of "charge
> whatever the market will bear" is the exact reason why the music industry
> is now faced with the fact that millions of otherwise perfectly law
> abiding and morally upright citizens are willing to download and share
> the music rather than pay those artificially high prices to further
> enrich the corporate coffers...
Sorry, people who steal music aren't 'perfectly law abiding and morally
upright".
The price is lower than it's ever been after adjusting for inflation.
>
> **Even if they violate current copyright law doing so.**
>
> Pretty much comes down to: "If you don't like it, tough shit" when you
> cut through all the other rhetoric, flippo. You are an insignificant
> barnacle on the dinghy of life and neither the p2p community nor the RIAA
> really gives a shit what you think about the whole thing.
>
I realize that you don't care about people with morality. You're intent
on stealing the music and nothing anyone could possibly say would change
that. That's not my problem - it's yours.
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
|