Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Mark" <markcr31uk@bluenospamyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.music
Subject: Keith Richards 'should have died in 1996'
Lines: 30
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <COM%b.9130$lk3.2360@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:22:35 -0000
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.36.83.208
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blueyonder.co.uk
X-Trace: news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk 1077909794 82.36.83.208 (Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:23:14 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:23:14 GMT
Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.music:747
Ananova:
Keith Richards 'should have died in 1996'
Keith Richards should have died eight years ago, according to a health
expert.
The 60-year-old Rolling Stone has outlived all expectations and "eluded
death" after years of hard living, claims an American gerontologist.
David Demko investigated the lifestyles of music's biggest names and
predicted their death dates in a survey entitled When will Your Favourite
Rock star die? for US music magazine Blender.
Speaking about Richards, Demko: "He should have passed away at 52. I'm not
sure how he does it but he defies all conventional wisdom. Eighty per cent
of the factors that control how long you live are related to your lifestyle
not genes."
The guitarist admitted on his 60th birthday last year: "There are a lot of
people who never thought I'd make it this far."
Among his other predictions, Demko concluded that Ozzy Osborne will die in
2013 aged 65, Whitney Houston, 40, will only make it to 59 and Michael
Jackson, 45, will die at the age of 76.
But Sting fares rather better in the life expectancy list. According to
Demko's calculation, he should live to the age of 93.
|
|