Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: The Reverend Lincoln Lincoln <dogwander@frostwarning.com>
Newsgroups: alt.music
Subject: Re: Who do I see at the RIAA to get...
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:24:05 -0400
Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <1ic0iv8t5q4hekhnqgjqbij91j3rqlhd63@4ax.com>
References: <aa99175a9a0d998a4002e4eb9367b3b6@free.teranews.com> <Xns93C15C5E140C44vgvyf@204.127.199.17> <34a4ae66c539a8d0b0ace3219717a068@free.teranews.com> <bfmjtj$nou$1@kestrel.csrv.uidaho.edu> <684d8363e8ac4903bd0d09e6225a9830@free.teranews.com> <MPG.1988fff4f4f93e9b9897da@news.cis.dfn.de> <f314964c4250fd6e0f512e7f8610e02e@free.teranews.com> <MPG.19899d1c30c33099897e0@news.cis.dfn.de> <0p70iv09kjb9f54nki34silh2lj8lsjdrg@4ax.com> <MPG.1989f8126bbc80759897e6@news.cis.dfn.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-956.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.music:69
CQ come on down:
>In a previous post, The Reverend Lincoln Lincoln said...
>
>> Well, take it up with the state of Virginia, because that's how their statute
>> construed it.
>
>Um, hey there, rev, I'm with you on this one. I don't need nor want to
>take it up with the State of Virginia. I understand very well that that
>is how their statute worded it which is, in my opinion, a clear cut case
>for the argument that the "law" is not always perfect and is not always
>correct.
>
>My point was that the statute (and the way it was written) was fucked up,
>not that your take on it was.
>
>But take it any way you want.
OK, apologies. I just wasn't entirely clear on the implications of what you
were saying.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|