CQ come on down:
>In a previous post, The Reverend Lincoln Lincoln said...
>
>> Well, take it up with the state of Virginia, because that's how their statute
>> construed it.
>
>Um, hey there, rev, I'm with you on this one. I don't need nor want to
>take it up with the State of Virginia. I understand very well that that
>is how their statute worded it which is, in my opinion, a clear cut case
>for the argument that the "law" is not always perfect and is not always
>correct.
>
>My point was that the statute (and the way it was written) was fucked up,
>not that your take on it was.
>
>But take it any way you want.
OK, apologies. I just wasn't entirely clear on the implications of what you
were saying.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|