| Re: iPod is great, but wireless headphones would be better--Suggestions? |
FakeCo, Inc. |
| ZnU (znu@acedsl.com) |
2004/01/20 01:37 |
In article <8uvo00drv3l4giehbods9loa4ecoq4pjpr@4ax.com>,
Matt <matt@downwithspammers-mengland.net> wrote:
> (Sorry if this is a duplicate post; I'm having problems with this
> particular posting thread. -Matt)
>
>
> I love my iPod. All my music in one little box. Books (from
> audible.com). Extra storage for my computer. It's all good.
>
> It would be worlds better for me if I wasn't *constantly* detangling
> my iPod headphones cord(s). How far away are we from economical,
> wireless headphone "earbuds"? I think I would pay big money for
> these, for I'd probably use my iPod twice as much if I had them. So
> many times I want listen but really can't because it's so much work to
> untangle my headphone cords (or roll them/unroll them for storage).
>
> Alternatively, is there simply a better way to make a wired headphone
> set so that it doesn't get so tangled? Retractable, spring-loaded?
> SOMETHING??
>
> Any products on the market that might address my problem(s) with these
> headphones? I really don't want to lose my "remote control" built
> into the headphone cord--that's too valuable.
>
> Thanks for any thoughts, suggestions, pointers,
Hmm. You could get an iTrip, and one of headsets with a built-in FM
receiver.
--
"Our country puts $1 billion a year up to help feed the hungry. And we're by far
the most generous nation in the world when it comes to that, and I'm proud to
report that. This isn't a contest of who's the most generous. I'm just telling
you as an aside. We're generous. We shouldn't be bragging about it. But we are.
We're very generous."
-- George W. Bush in Washington, D.C., July 16, 2003
|
|
|