Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org>
Newsgroups: alt.music
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Subject: Re: iPod is great, but wireless headphones would be better--Suggestions?
Organization: Society for the Preservation of Endangered Societies
References: <8uvo00drv3l4giehbods9loa4ecoq4pjpr@4ax.com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.3b1 (PPC Mac OS X)
x-no-archive: yes
Message-ID: <michelle-A150F2.00394320012004@news.west.cox.net>
Lines: 13
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:39:43 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.225.198.178
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net
X-Trace: fed1read01 1074584383 68.225.198.178 (Tue, 20 Jan 2004 02:39:43 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 02:39:43 EST
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.music:593
In article <8uvo00drv3l4giehbods9loa4ecoq4pjpr@4ax.com>,
Matt <matt@downwithspammers-mengland.net> wrote:
> It would be worlds better for me if I wasn't *constantly* detangling
> my iPod headphones cord(s). How far away are we from economical,
> wireless headphone "earbuds"? I think I would pay big money for
> these, for I'd probably use my iPod twice as much if I had them.
You would need an RF transmitter for the iPod to get it to work with
wireless headphones.
--
Never play strip tarot.
|
|