Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Norton Zenger <dogwander@frostwarning.com>
Newsgroups: alt.music
Subject: Re: Self-Replicating File Sharing Bots To Defeat RIAA
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 01:34:26 -0400
Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <22jphv475n8e6ekks248lctv9gej62vaud@4ax.com>
References: <9d7e35a3.0307200326.5b77a466@posting.google.com> <vhl6r6h270313b@corp.supernews.com> <3f1ac537_6@corp.newsgroups.com> <flippo-54790E.12261020072003@news.central.cox.net> <d2nlhvo9dmdhn6r3mc2ppf1re07javjpiu@4ax.com> <etplhvcejp7rsi4capegp9boddjl3pi6ph@4ax.com> <jbednXbfFfXD_4aiXTWJhw@comcast.com> <flippo-67A13E.06042721072003@news.central.cox.net> <cukohv81k7qgh4sbhds1i8i95a8dp8rsq4@farfoos> <flip-51E1AB.16260021072003@nnrp04.earthlink.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-698.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.music:35
Flip come on down:
>In article <cukohv81k7qgh4sbhds1i8i95a8dp8rsq4@farfoos>,
> Onideus Mad Hatter <mad_hatter@charter.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:04:33 GMT, flip <flippo@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <jbednXbfFfXD_4aiXTWJhw@comcast.com>,
>> > "Deborah Terreson" <foodNOTSPAMandart@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> How about some more realistic edification:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.janisian.com/article-internet_debacle.html
>> >>
>> >> Don't forget to read her follow-up article. The link is on the page.
>> >>
>> >> Deb.
>> >
>> >That's a nice summary of the philosophy of the 'we're too cheap to pay
>> >for our music and we're going to steal it anyway, so the record
>> >company's fault that we steal it because they won't give it to us for
>> >some ridiculously low price" crowd.
>> >
>> >Too bad there's nothing there that hasn't been widely debunked over and
>> >over.
>> >
>> >Face it, you're stealing music - whether you like it or not.
>>
>> I don't mean to interrupt you, Tinkerbell, but how can you steal something
>> that's worthless? See
>> that's what it really boils down to, what you define as worth. Now, you got
>
>Sorry. If the person who owns it says that it has value, then you have
>no right to steal it.
Ah. Right, then. I own this Usenet post. This Usenet post is a BRILLIANT
WORK OF ART and it is valued at one million dollars. If you download this
post onto your hard drive, you are STEALING MY BRILLIANT AND CREATIVE WORK and
you are nothing more than a PETTY THIEF LOUT. Well, OK, not really "petty", I
mean, we're talking about a million US dollars here, but the point here is
that I don't care to be lectured by a common criminal on my morals,
particularly when said common criminal owes me a million smackeroos.
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|