Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Gran <abg1953@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
Subject: Re: 'Which' or 'That'
Message-ID: <asi2f152guvjpbjorjbd7tsfaje1jiv35u@4ax.com>
References: <qi22f1h7b99p6hmejgtnbd7ceaqrkgbb0f@4ax.com> <1123104006.340120.74060@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <bpf2f1h0ilqu3mj7ih0na5p1ljr21ashtl@4ax.com> <3ld01gF1268s2U2@individual.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 33
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 23:05:21 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.102.82.167
X-Trace: newsfe7-win.ntli.net 1123110321 81.102.82.167 (Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:05:21 BST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:05:21 BST
Organization: NTL
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:938
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 23:49:55 +0100, "Mike Lyle"
<mike_lyle_uk@REMOVETHISyahoo.co.uk> tickled the keyboard to say:
>Gran wrote:
>[...]
>> Now we get into dear old Microsoft and its rather vague way of
>> suggesting alternatives when checking. It frequently wants to
>replace
>> 'which' with 'that' and I wondered if there's something basic I'm
>> missing (like education).
>>
>> Bear with me - I'm willing to learn!
>
>Ah, another Micrsoft victim! Ignore that bastard: it's got a
>more-American-than-the-Americans thing about "that". I don't actually
>think this which-that choice is something which (see that one? it
>could have been a "that") adult native speakers of English actually
>get wrong, which (see that one? it could NOT have been a "that") is
>nice.
I just thought of where 'that' doesn't fit .....
"That colour do you prefer?"
Maybe I'll make my on rule (see that which I've invented ) and stick
with it.
Thanks guys. Sometimes it helps just to unload that which bothers one.
(I hate 'one' but that's another story which I''ll go into another
time.)
--
Gran
Last night I dreamt I had written 'Lord Of The Rings'.
This morning I realised I'd just been Tolkein in my sleep.
|
|