From: <honlong@englishdaily626.com>
Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
References: <vopk9028mt5nbe@corp.supernews.com>
Subject: Re: Grammar Help
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:29:37 +0800
Lines: 20
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
NNTP-Posting-Host: 219.95.9.31
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 219.95.9.31
Message-ID: <3f95dd7f_1@news.tm.net.my>
X-Trace: news.tm.net.my 1066786175 219.95.9.31 (22 Oct 2003 09:29:35 +0800)
Organization: TMnet Malaysia
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:92
I think the first one is more logical.
--
www.englishdaily626.com
"nh1980" <nh1980@thematrix.com> wrote in message
news:vopk9028mt5nbe@corp.supernews.com...
> Which is correct?
>
> #1) All the boys should go with their father?
>
> #2) All the boys should go with their fathers?
>
> In question #1, it implies that all boys have the same father? Is this
> assumption correct?
> In question #2, it implies that all the different boys have different
> fathers? Is this correct? It can also imply each one has more than one
> father?
>
>
|
|