Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Mike Lyle" <mike_lyle_uk@REMOVETHISyahoo.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
Subject: Re: used to
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:26:01 +0100
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <3jpvcnFrbhsuU1@individual.net>
References: <1120427607.208666.126580@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <slrndcitiq.rrd.chris@ccserver.keris.net> <pskjc1hpl89ib7cn6mq3p6rf60lrj372lt@4ax.com> <slrndclb7q.gu1.chris@ccserver.keris.net> <1120991765.440768.39790@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <slrndd27pr.pm8.chris@ccserver.keris.net> <1121041347.535908.253920@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <3jg4ovFpsiliU1@individual.net> <1121277453.522891.209910@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
X-Trace: individual.net x9lxqOgFQ40IswBidC2xAwIPnh2Vw16dTmliThmdMUSiQzLo2w
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:880
credoquaabsurdum wrote:
> Mike Lyle wrote:
>
>>> ...apostrophe firmly in place. I would bet, however, that this is
>>> not a typo on behalf of OED staff, but that they scanned the
>>> original printing and that's how it first appeared. A Google
search
>>> turned up news of a critical edition of Major Barbara, but from
>>> what I understand, OED policy in that case is still to scan the
>>> first edition (be it UK or US) into their database.
>>
>> I don't think they "scan". For good or ill. Are you in a position
to
>> correct me on this point?
>
> Uh-huh. But then again, so are you.
>
> http://www.oed.com/about/oed3-preface/accuracy.html
[...]
Hang about. (This is a genuine question, not a smart-arsery.) I'm
taking "scan" in its restricted OCR-type meaning: you mean they do
that? I wouldn't dream of getting evidence for a dictionary by that
means, especially reading a wide variety of print styles.
--
Mike.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
|