alt.languages.englishPrev. Next
Re: What's with ? StarHub Internet Pte Ltd
Lion (Nospam@com.sg) 2005/07/13 17:02

From: "Lion" <Nospam@com.sg>
Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
References: <Misc-F2DF2B.07131011072005@newssvr14-ext.news.prodigy.com> <42d4f09c$1@news.starhub.net.sg> <slrnddaqkb.eoa.chris@ccserver.keris.net>
Subject: Re: What's with ?
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:02:52 +0800
Lines: 29
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
NNTP-Posting-Host: 222.164.46.193
Message-ID: <42d59d9e$1@news.starhub.net.sg>
X-Trace: 14 Jul 2005 07:02:54 +0800, 222.164.46.193
Organization: StarHub Internet Pte Ltd
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:876

"Chris Croughton" <chris@keristor.net> wrote ...
>  Lion <Nospam@com.sg> wrote:
>
>> Pardon my ignorance.  What's the meaning of 'what's with' in this
>> context.
>> When written in full, what do these two words stand for ?
>
> It's an American colloqialism, an idiom which doesn't make much sense
> literally.  "What is the situation regarding ..." might be a more full
> translation of it in this case.  In some others it's a contraction of
> "What is happening with ...", as in "What's with the picnic on
> Saturday?"
>
> So what the poster meant in this case was something like:
>
>  "What is the situation regarding the use of the double negative in
>  English?"
>
> It's an idiom which has, via television and other media, made its way
> into English as well, unfortunately...

Interesting.  Many thanks.

By the way, looking back at what I've written, is it more correct for me to
write "When written out in full ..."?

Lion



Follow-ups:12345
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite