Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "John Dean" <john-dean@frag.lineone.net>
Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
Subject: Re: much as a determiner or an adverb?
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 00:23:43 +0100
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <d8t1ja$mfv$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk>
References: <64hoa19deuedo1ak34qq7s96onaeiq07h3@4ax.com> <1118954714.082577.299290@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.137.127.102
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news7.svr.pol.co.uk 1118964138 23039 62.137.127.102 (16 Jun 2005 23:22:18 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Jun 2005 23:22:18 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse@theplanet.net
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:781
credoquaabsurdum wrote:
> I vote for an adjective. The structure seems fundamentally related to:
>
> "Too lazy a man to respond appropriately"
> "Too boring a day to write something interesting"
> "Too odd a morning to not reply to something like this flippantly"
> "Too geeky a post to reply to in the carefully reasoned manner of a
> language researcher"
>
> I'm also not quite clear on exactly what a determiner is, and well,
> neither are many professional grammarians. Can we restrict a
> determiner to the classic list: definite and indefinite articles,
> possessive adjectives, indicative pronouns, partitives, or must we
> open ourselves to a more open definition where we simply say a
> determiner...determines?
>
> One thing is certainly for sure: too much of nothing can make a man
> feel ill at ease.
Are you suggesting that one man's temper might rise while another man's
temper might freeze?
--
John Dean
Oxford
|
|