No, it wasn't rediscovery, and thanks for conceding that you can not
point to any other source that made that discovery or that observation
other than sources that repeated the info from rexcurry.net
It was telling that you dropped that part of the message. It is also
telling that you haven't stated what the intertwined "S" shapes were
supposed to represent.
http://rexcurry.net/swastikanews.html
It has been interesting to see how long it would take for people to
accept the discovery of rexcurry.net and to repeat it as if it were old
knowledge. It is fascinating to see that it is now happening here in
these groups. Thanks a lot. It makes me feel like a heroic genius.
|
|