Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Devast8or" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
Subject: Re: Adressing a queen?
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:45:33 +0100
Organization: Cybercity
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <cua507$2q8g$1@news.cybercity.dk>
References: <cu8tju$1qae$1@news.cybercity.dk> <Misc-5BCFB9.20323707022005@individual.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: port106.ds1-oel.adsl.cybercity.dk
X-Trace: news.cybercity.dk 1107859271 92432 217.157.233.207 (8 Feb 2005 10:41:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cybercity.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:41:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:569
Miss Elaine Eos wrote:
> In article <cu8tju$1qae$1@news.cybercity.dk>,
> "Devast8or" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> does anyone know if there's an equivalent of "Sire" for adressing a
>> queen?
>>
>> (except of course for using "your majesty").
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> Devast8or
>
> "Your highness."
Oh. I thouhgtn that was used for people of less stature than the king/queen.
> ...And one does not address the queen; one RESPONDS to the queen, when
> addressed. <G>
Heh, right :)
Thanks
Devast8or
|
|