| Re: No smoking, drinking and eating ... is this correct? |
Posted via Supernews, ht .. |
| Brenton James (bjdube@chartermi.net) |
2004/10/25 23:03 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Brenton James" <bjdube@chartermi.net>
Newsgroups: alt.languages.english
Subject: Re: No smoking, drinking and eating ... is this correct?
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 01:03:37 -0400
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <10nrmj7s5k43aa2@corp.supernews.com>
References: <10n039fnv35j79b@corp.supernews.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 24
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.languages.english:448
Maybe "drinking and eating" was mixed together as one type of action.
"Neil Kolban" <kolban@kolban.com> wrote in message
news:10n039fnv35j79b@corp.supernews.com...
> Folks,
> While traveling in San Francisco this week, I noticed that their tram
system
> at the airport states:
>
> "This tram is a no smoking, drinking and eating facility".
>
> My question is ... should this not be:
>
> "This tram is a no smoking, drinking OR eating facility".
>
> Does their initial statement not mean that I am not allowed to smoke,
drink
> and eat simultaneously but any combination of these is permissible?
>
> Neil
>
>
|
|
|